How to construct gamma matrices with two lower spinor indices for any dimension?

Osiris
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Generally, Gamma matrices with one lower and one upper indices could be constructed based on the Clifford algebra.
\begin{equation}
\gamma^{i}\gamma^{j}+\gamma^{j}\gamma^{i}=2h^{ij},
\end{equation}

My question is how to generally construct gamma matrices with two lower indices. There should be at least two ways.
1). construct and use the charge conjugation matrix to lower one spinor index in the gamma matrix;
2). use inner product to directly obtain the gamma matrices with two lower spinor indices, something like $$<\Gamma e_{\alpha}, e_{\beta}>=\Gamma_{\alpha,\beta}$$, where $$e_{\alpha}$$ are the basis element.

In even dimensions (D=2m), consider
complex Grassmann algebra $$\Lambda_{m}[\alpha^{1},...,\alpha^{m}]$$ with
generators $$\alpha^{1},...,\alpha^{m}.$$) Namely, we define $$\widehat{\alpha
}^{i}$$ and $$\widehat{\beta}_{i}$$ as multiplication and differentiation
operators:
\begin{equation}
\widehat{\alpha}^{i}\psi=\alpha^{i}\psi,
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\widehat{\beta}_{i}\psi=\frac{\partial}{\partial \alpha ^{i}}\psi.
\end{equation}

According to the Grassmann algebra, we have
\begin{equation}
\widehat{\alpha}^{i}\widehat{\alpha}^{j}+\widehat{\alpha}^{j}\widehat{\alpha}^{i}=0,
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
\widehat{\beta}_{i}\widehat{\beta}_{j}+\widehat{\beta}_{j} \widehat{\beta}_{i}=0
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
\widehat{\alpha}^{i}\widehat{\beta}_{j}+\widehat{\beta}_{j} \widehat{\alpha}^{i}=delta_{j}^{i}
\end{equation}

This means that $$\widehat{\alpha}^{1},...,\widehat{\alpha}^{m}, \widehat{\beta}_{1},...,\widehat{\beta}_{m}$$ specify a representation of Clifford algebra
for some choice of $h$ (namely, for $h$ corresponding to quadratic form
$$\frac{1}{2}(x^{1}x^{m+1}+x^{2}x^{m+2}+...+x^{m}x^{2m})$$). It follows that
operators
\begin{equation}
\Gamma^{j}=\widehat{\alpha}^{j}+\widehat{\beta}_{j},1\leq j\leq m,
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\Gamma^{j}=\widehat{\alpha}^{j-m}-\widehat{\beta}_{j-m},m<j\leq2m,
\end{equation}
determine a representation of $Cl(m,m,\mathbb{C})$


For example, in $D=4$, we can obtain
$$\Gamma^{1}=\begin{pmatrix}0&
1&
0&
0\\
1&
0&
0&
0\\
0&
0&
0&
1\\
0&
0&
1&
0\\
\end{pmatrix}$$,
$$\Gamma^{2}=\begin{pmatrix}0&
0&
0&
1\\
0&
0&
{-1}&
0\\
0&
{-1}&
0&
0\\
1&
0&
0&
0\\
\end{pmatrix}$$,
$$\Gamma^{3}=\begin{pmatrix}0&
{-1}&
0&
0\\
1&
0&
0&
0\\
0&
0&
0&
1\\
0&
0&
{-1}&
0\\
\end{pmatrix}$$,
$$\Gamma^{4}=\begin{pmatrix}0&
0&
0&
{-1}\\
0&
0&
1&
0\\
0&
{-1}&
0&
0\\
1&
0&
0&
0\\
\end{pmatrix}$$


My question is how to generally construct the charge conjugation matrix C, so that we could have
$$C\Gamma C^{-1}=+/-\Gamma^T$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any tips will be greatly appreciated.
:)
 
If you are looking for the charge conjugation matrix in various dimensions then check out the back of Polchinski's "String Theory Volume 2". Appendix B has everything you'll need.
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
Hello everyone, I am seeking to better understand the conceptual foundations and potential consequences of "Two-Time Physics" (2T-physics), as developed by Itzhak Bars and others. My interest was sparked by a recent paper that attempts to explain anomalous results in particle physics (apparent superluminal propagation of virtual photons) within the framework of 2T-physics: Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02696 Key quote from the abstract: *"...the problem... can be solved naturally...
Back
Top