How to Convert Between Joules and Kilojoules in Quantum Theory

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the energy associated with the excitation of a molecular vibration with a period of 20 femtoseconds using the equation ΔE = h/t. The user successfully converted femtoseconds to seconds and calculated the energy in joules. However, they struggled with converting this energy into kilojoules per mole, questioning the sufficiency of the provided information. They recognized the need to account for the number of molecules in a mole to complete the conversion. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding unit conversions in quantum theory calculations.
csinger1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the size of the quantum involved in the excitation of a molecular vibration of period 20 fs. Express the results in joules and kilojoules per mole.

Homework Equations



ΔE = h/t

The Attempt at a Solution


I converted fs to seconds and used the above equation to figure out the answer in terms of joules, no problem. I have checked my answer for this, so I know it is correct. I also know what the answer is in terms of kilojoules per mole, but I can't for the life of me figure out exactly how to convert between the two. It doesn't seem as though I'm given enough information in the problem to do this conversion. I assumed that I would need to use the fact that 1000J=1kJ, but that doesn't seem to match up with the answer sheet that I was given.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You know energy required to excite one molecule. How many molecules in a mole?
 
That was so simple! Thanks!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
58
Views
2K
Replies
91
Views
7K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Back
Top