How to convert Sturm Liouville to into Bessel's eqn.

  • Thread starter Thread starter fantastic_dan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convert
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on converting a Sturm-Liouville problem, specifically the equation xy" + 2y' + λxy = 0 with boundary conditions y(∏) = 2 and y(2∏) = 0, into Bessel's equation. Daniel, the original poster, seeks guidance on solving this problem. A suggested approach involves using a series solution, particularly noting that x=0 is a regular singular point, and considering substitutions such as u=yx to simplify the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Sturm-Liouville theory
  • Familiarity with Bessel's equation
  • Knowledge of series solutions in differential equations
  • Basic concepts of singular points in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research series solutions for Sturm-Liouville problems
  • Study the derivation and properties of Bessel's equation
  • Explore techniques for solving differential equations with regular singular points
  • Investigate the method of substitution in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students dealing with differential equations, particularly those interested in Sturm-Liouville problems and their applications to Bessel functions.

fantastic_dan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I've been given a Sturm Liouville problem to solve:

xy" + 2y' + λxy = 0

y(∏) = 2, y(2∏) = 0

I'm not sure how to solve this problem. However, it looks similar to Bessel's equation. Any ideas?

Thanks,
Daniel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fantastic_dan said:
Hello, I've been given a Sturm Liouville problem to solve:

xy" + 2y' + λxy = 0

y(∏) = 2, y(2∏) = 0

I'm not sure how to solve this problem. However, it looks similar to Bessel's equation. Any ideas?

Thanks,
Daniel

I would suggest trying a series solution noting ##x=0## is a regular singular point.
 
LCKurtz said:
I would suggest trying a series solution noting ##x=0## is a regular singular point.

I would try some substitutions first. Like maybe u=yx.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K