How to convolve impulses in engineering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DWill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convolution
DWill
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I am just having a bit of difficulty figuring out how to do convolution of impulses. Suppose I have a function consisting of impulses located at -2ω0, 0, and +2ω0 (in frequency domain) with some arbitrary amplitude A. I want to convolve this function with another function consisting of two impulses located at -1ω0 and +1ω0 with some other arbitrary amplitude B.

I'm mainly confused because I'm not sure how the multiplication of two impulses would work.

Can anyone show me how this is done?

Thank you very much!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The convolution of periodic functions ##f,g## with period ##T## is defined as ##(f\ast g)(t)=\int_a^{a+T}f(\tau)g(t-\tau)\,d\tau ## so the only problem is to describe your impulses by e.g. a sine function.
 
It ia common for engineers to use the word "impulses" for delta functions. If this is what the OP is referring to, then the convolution of impulses follows the rule
## \delta(\omega-\omega_0) \ast \delta(\omega-\omega_1) = \delta(\omega-\omega_0-\omega_1)
##
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top