How to create a conical source (mamography) in Vgate

Click For Summary
To create a conical source in Vgate, it’s important to clarify whether the goal is a conical shaped volume or a conical beam. For a conical beam, a circular aperture can be used, though a shadow mask may be less efficient. Adjust the source parameters by setting the angular distribution of emission and defining minimum and maximum emission angles. This setup will produce a conical beam directed along the Z-axis. Accurate trigonometric calculations may be necessary for precise angle adjustments.
Alexander Camargo
Messages
37
Reaction score
10
I am new in Vgate software.
I've tried a lot of things, but nothing works. I need to create a conical source that is 4 cm in radius and 16 cm in length. Example in photo attached
exemplo do que preciso.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Do you mean a conical source, a conical shaped volume which emits, or do you mean a conical beam? You can set min and max emission angles for sources.
 
Alex A said:
Do you mean a conical source, a conical shaped volume which emits, or do you mean a conical beam? You can set min and max emission angles for sources.
conical beam with a focal spot of 0.3mm. The focal spot is not problema, my problem is create a conical beam
 
A conical beam for a point source is produced with a circular aperture.

Conical beam.png
 
A shadow mask is functional but may be inefficient.

Consider editing the source parameters to something like;

Code:
# SET THE ANGULAR DISTRIBUTION OF EMISSION
/gate/source/yoursourcename/gps/angtype iso
# SET MIN AND MAX EMISSION ANGLES
/gate/source/yoursourcename/gps/mintheta 0. deg
/gate/source/yoursourcename/gps/maxtheta 14. deg
/gate/source/yoursourcename/gps/minphi    0. deg
/gate/source/yoursourcename/gps/maxphi 360. deg

This is the spherical physics coordinate system. This should produce a conical beam in the Z direction.

Redo the trig to get a more accurate angle if you need it.
 
What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom? When an atom is split—such as in a nuclear explosion—it releases enormous energy, much of it in the form of gamma-ray electromagnetic radiation. Given this, is it correct to say that the energy stored in the atom is fundamentally electromagnetic (EM) energy? If not, how should we properly understand the nature of the energy that binds the nucleus and is released during fission?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
526
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
67
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K