How to Derive the Exact Expression for Dirichlet Series g(s)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mitchell2007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
mitchell2007
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Let be the series in the form g(s)= \sum_{1 \le n } |\Lambda (n) |^{2} n^{-s} where lambda is Von Mangoldt function, my question is how could i get an exact or at least almost exact expresion for g(s) . My other question is how could i obtainthe Mellin transform of the function \Lambda (n+2) \Lambda (n+1) i have tried sum by parts but got no results.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
of course i tried (wrong ??) with the property, given a Dirchlet series g(s)= \sum_{1 \le n} f(n)n^{-s} then -g'(s)/g(s)= \sum_{1 \le n} f(n) \Lambda (n) n^{-s} but i think this does not work unless f(n) is multiplicative, however could it be used at least as a good approximation or modifying it a bit coul work??
 
Last edited:
Welcome back, Jose.
 
readng Tom Apostol's 'Introduction to Analytic number theory' the desired series is just AT^{-1} \int_{-T}^{T}dt | \frac{ \zeta ' (a+it)}{\zeta (a+it)} |^{2} = \sum_{1 \le n} | \Lambda (n) |^{2} n^{2a} , with a>1 and T tending to infinity. but i don't know the value of the integral, could someone provide an approximate value of the integral over t (-T,T) above ??, thank you.
 
How many accounts has this guy made on here?
 
I have also tried using partial summation so:

\sum_{n \le x } \Lambda (n+2) \Lambda (n) = B(x)= \Lambda (x+2) \Psi (x) - \sum_{n \le x } \Psi (x) ( \Lambda (x+2) - \Lambda (x+1) )

so g(s)= \sum_{1 \le n} \Lambda (n+2) \Lambda (n) n^{-s}= s \int_{1}^{\infty}B(x) x^{- (s+1)}

to obtain 'g(s)' any hint please?? thanx.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top