How to derive the multivariate normal distribution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on deriving the multivariate normal distribution, specifically the density function given an invertible covariance matrix. Participants explore various methods for this derivation, including transformations and the use of cumulative distribution functions (CDFs).

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the density function of the multivariate normal distribution and seeks guidance on its derivation.
  • Another suggests starting from an independent normal distribution and performing a change of variables.
  • A different participant proposes using the CDF of a standard i.i.d. Gaussian vector and differentiating to obtain the PDF, detailing a transformation involving a matrix.
  • Concerns are raised about the appearance of the determinant in the denominator during differentiation, with a participant questioning why it should be related to \det(\mathbf{AA^T}) instead of \det(\mathbf{A}).
  • One participant concludes that the covariance matrix can be expressed as \mathbf{\Sigma} = \mathbf{A}\mathbf{A}^T, indicating a resolution to their earlier confusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

While some participants refine their understanding and express agreement on the form of the covariance matrix, there remains uncertainty regarding the correct application of determinants in the derivation process. The discussion does not reach a consensus on all aspects of the derivation.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion over the differentiation steps and the relationship between the determinants involved, indicating potential limitations in their mathematical reasoning or assumptions about the transformations used.

jone
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If the covariance matrix \mathbf{\Sigma} of the multivariate normal distribution is invertible one can derive the density function:

f(x_1,...,x_n) = f(\mathbf{x}) = \frac{1}{(\sqrt(2\pi))^n\sqrt(\det(\mathbf{\Sigma)}}\exp(-\frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{\mu})^T\mathbf{\Sigma}^{-1}(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{\mu}))

So, how do I derive the above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with a normal distribution where all the variables are independent and then do a change of variables.
 
I was on that track before, make use of the CDF and then differentiate back to get the PDF. This is how far I get: Let Y be a standard i.i.d. Gaussian vector. Then use the transformation

<br /> \mathbf{X} = \mathbf{A}\mathbf{Y} + \mathbf{\mu}<br />

<br /> P(\mathbf{X} &lt; \mathbf{x}) = P(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{Y} + \mathbf{\mu} &lt; \mathbf{x}) = P(\mathbf{Y} &lt; \mathbf{A}^{-1}(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{\mu}))<br />
Now I differentiate this to get the PDF

<br /> f_{\mathbf{X}}(\mathbf{x}) = f_{\mathbf{Y}}(\mathbf{A}^{-1}\mathbf{x-\mu})\det(\mathbf{A}^{-1}) = f_{\mathbf{Y}}(\mathbf{A}^{-1}\mathbf{x-\mu})\frac{1}{\det(\mathbf{A})} = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{n/2}\det(A)}\exp\left(\frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{x-\mu})^{T}(\mathbf{AA^T})^{-1}(\mathbf{x-\mu})\right)<br />

So \det(\mathbf{A})} pops out in the denominator, instead of \det(\mathbf{AA^T})} it as it should be. Something is wrong in my differentiation here but I can't figure it out.
 
jone said:
So \det(\mathbf{A})} pops out in the denominator, instead of \det(\mathbf{AA^T})} it as it should be. Something is wrong in my differentiation here but I can't figure it out.

Why do you think the denominator should be \det(\mathbf{AA^T})}.

That would give you something analogies to the variance while the denominator of the Gaussian function is the standard deviation.

You want:

\sqrt{|\mathbf{AA^T}|}=\sqrt{|\mathbf{A}|}\sqrt{|\mathbf{A^T}|}=|\mathbf{A}|
 
Ok, so now it works out. \mathbf{\Sigma} = \mathbf{A}\mathbf{A}^T is the covariance matrix. Thank you for your help!
 
jone said:
Ok, so now it works out. \mathbf{\Sigma} = \mathbf{A}\mathbf{A}^T is the covariance matrix. Thank you for your help!

exactly! And, your welcome :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K