How to Derive the PDF of a Continuous Random Variable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcfc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distribution
mcfc
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello

I'm not too sure if this is the correct location for my post, but it's the best fit I can see!

The cdf of the continuous random variable X is
F(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}0&amp;\mbox{ if }x&lt; 0\\<br /> {1\over 4} x^2 &amp; \mbox{ if } 0 \leq x \leq 2\\<br /> 1 &amp;\mbox{ if } x &gt;2\end{array}\right.

Q1-Obtain the pdf of X
Q2-If Y = 2 - X, derive the pdf of the random variable Y

A1-I think the cdf is given by f(x) = F&#039;(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}{1\over 2}x &amp;\mbox{ if } 0 \leq x \leq 2 \\<br /> 0 &amp;\mbox{ elsewhere } \end{array}\right.
Is that correct?

A2-For the pdf of Y: G(Y) = P(Y \leq y) = P(2 - x \leq y) = P(x \geq 2-y)<br /> but I'm not sure how to proceed??
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A1 - you're right.

A2 G(y) = P(Y \leq y) = P(2 - X \leq y) = P(X \geq 2-y) = 1-P(X &lt; 2-y)=1-F(2-y)
G'(y)=F'(2-y) for the pdf
 
mathman said:
A1 - you're right.

A2 G(y) = P(Y \leq y) = P(2 - X \leq y) = P(X \geq 2-y) = 1-P(X &lt; 2-y)=1-F(2-y)
G'(y)=F'(2-y) for the pdf

Thanks,
Q1-how would I evaluate:
G(y) = 1-F(2-y)\<br /> \mbox{to give the cdf? Do I just substitute 2-y into }{1 \over 4} x^2 \mbox{ to give }<br /> G(Y) = 1 - {1 \over 4} (2-y)^2 = 4y - {1 \over 4}y^2\ for \ 0 \leq y \leq 2
\mbox{for the cdf of Y? and so for the pdf: } 4-{1 \over 2}y

Q2-Why are you able to make this step: 1-P(X &lt; 2-y)=1-F(2-y)
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top