Deriving the Characteristic Function of the Gaussian Distribution

  • Thread starter Thread starter tuanle007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive Point
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the characteristic function of the Gaussian distribution, specifically addressing confusion over a mathematical expression. Participants clarify that the expected value of a function is calculated using its probability density function. An error in the derivation is noted regarding the x^2 term, which should simply be x. There is a misunderstanding about the equivalence of two exponential expressions, with participants emphasizing that the task is to prove the characteristic function for the Gaussian distribution. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting mathematical statements and definitions.
tuanle007
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
hello, can someone look at my problem and tell me how to get to the arrow?
thank you so much..
i am studying for my midterm and i have no clue where it come from.
thanks
 

Attachments

  • untitled.PNG
    untitled.PNG
    9.4 KB · Views: 488
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That first line you point to is basically just the definition of how you find the "expected value" of a function.

That is, if a random variable X has a pdf (probablity density function) of f(x) then the expected value of x can be written as,

E(x) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} x f(x) dx

And more generally the expected value of a function of x can be written as,

E(\, \phi(x)\, ) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \phi(x) f(x) dx
 
Last edited:
BTW, there's an error in that derivation. The x^2 term that appears in the first square bracketed term in line 4 (2nd line under the completing the square heading) should be just "x" (not squared). This error is carried all the way through the derivation BTW.
 
yeah.i understand that part..
but how does exp(-o^2w^2/2) = exp(-x^2/2o^2)?
the arrow...
 
tuanle007 said:
yeah.i understand that part..
but how does exp(-o^2w^2/2) = exp(-x^2/2o^2)?
the arrow...

What? It never says that anywhere. The question says to prove that,

\Phi(\omega) = exp(-\sigma^2 \omega^2 /2)

You must be misreading it because nowhere does it claim the thing you state.
 
tuanle007 said:
yeah.i understand that part..
but how does exp(-o^2w^2/2) = exp(-x^2/2o^2)?
the arrow...

It doesn't say that. It says that you are to prove that the [/b]characteristic function[/b] for the the Gaussian distribution is
e^{\frac{-\sigma^2\omega^2}{2}}[/itex]<br /> and them immediately uses the fact that the Gaussian distribution (with mean 0) itself can be written as <br /> e^{\frac{-x^2}{2\sigma^2}<br /> <br /> Those are two completely different functions.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top