How to Determine if a Particle Has Returned to the Origin?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining whether a particle returns to the origin after three phases of motion: acceleration, constant velocity, and deceleration. The calculations involve integrating velocity equations to find displacements for each phase, resulting in a total displacement of 0.7 meters. Although the particle is close to the origin, it has not fully returned to it by the end of the 28 seconds. The key point is to assess the additional time needed for the particle to reach the origin. The analysis confirms that while the approach is correct, further precision in timing is necessary to determine the exact moment of return.
The_Engineer
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point begins at rest at x = 0 and accelerates at 1.09 m/s^2 to the right for 10 s. It then continues at constant velocity of 10.9 m/s for 8 more seconds. In the third phase of its motion, it decelerates at 5 m/s^2 and is observed to be passing again through the origin when the total time of travel equals 28 s. Determine the whether or not the particle has passed returned to the origin.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am splitting up the motion into the 3 phases mentioned.
a1 = 1.09 ∴ v1 = 1.09t
v2 = 10.9
a3 = -5 ∴ v3 = -5t + c → v3(0) = v2(8) = 10.9 ∴ v3 = -5t + 10.9

Now I will get the displacements by integrating all of the velocity equations over their respective time intervals.
r1 = ∫v1 from 0 to 10 = 54.5
r2 = ∫v2 from 0 to 8 = 87.2
r3 = ∫v3 from 0 to 10 = -141

Adding all of the displacements,
r1 + r2 + r3 = 0.7 therefore the particle is almost at the origin but hasn't passed it again...



I don't know the correct answer but I know I am wrong... Am I going about this correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are doing it correctly.

The catch is in determining when the particle passes the origin, and then rounding that to the accuracy of the time measurements given in the problem.

Put simple, how much more time is required to reach the origin?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top