How to determine shape of surface of a fluid?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the shape of a fluid's surface and the forces acting on it. It is established that a fluid's surface is perpendicular to the net external forces, excluding internal fluid forces, particularly in static conditions. When a fluid is at rest in a vessel, its surface remains horizontal due to the balance of forces, while horizontal acceleration causes the surface to tilt diagonally rather than vertically. The Young-Laplace equation is referenced to explain the curvature of fluid surfaces under pressure differences. The conversation highlights the complexities of fluid behavior under various external influences, including shear stress and acceleration.
SurajBahuguna
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have been told by my teacher that the surface of a fluid is always perpendicular to the net force acting on it. The reason being a fluid can not withstand tangential stress and if a shear stress is applied to it, it will slip until the surface becomes perendicular to the net force. So my question is why the surface of water is horizontal in a vessl at rest even when the net force acting on it is zero? Also why does it become diagonal(and not vertical) when it is given some horizontal accleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SurajBahuguna said:
I have been told by my teacher that the surface of a fluid is always perpendicular to the net force acting on it.
I guess he meant net external force (forces from the fluid itself excluded) acting on the fluid at the surface.
 
  • Like
Likes SurajBahuguna
I differ in perceiving the statement your teacher gave. The surface of the fluid is always perpendicular to the net "external" (actual plus inertial) force acting on the surface in the frame of reference of the container in which it is kept.
 
  • Like
Likes SurajBahuguna
A.T. said:
I guess he meant net external force (forces from the fluid itself excluded) acting on the fluid at the surface.
Thanks for your reply. Does that mean the normal force acting on the fluid due to the container(which is equal in magnitude to the weight of fluid) has to be ignored because it does not have any influence on the surface of the fluid?
 
SurajBahuguna said:
Does that mean the normal force acting on the fluid due to the container(which is equal in magnitude to the weight of fluid) has to be ignored because it does not have any influence on the surface of the fluid?
The external forces by the wall influence the shape of the fluid at the wall.
 
SurajBahuguna said:
I have been told by my teacher that the surface of a fluid is always perpendicular to the net force acting on it. The reason being a fluid can not withstand tangential stress and if a shear stress is applied to it, it will slip until the surface becomes perendicular to the net force. So my question is why the surface of water is horizontal in a vessl at rest even when the net force acting on it is zero? Also why does it become diagonal(and not vertical) when it is given some horizontal accleration?

To the thread title, the shape of a fluid-fluid boundary is given by the Young-Laplace equation ΔP = γ ∇⋅n, that is to say the local curvature is equal to the pressure jump across the interface. This equation can be modified at a three-phase line (generalized theory of capillarity, principally by Neumann).

http://www.crcnetbase.com/doi/abs/10.1201/EBK0849396878-2

Regarding your question about fluid in a bucket, "Newton's bucket" is a delightful problem to consider as it leads, per Mach, directly to general relativity.
 
I guess you are talking about free surfaces here, and moreover, free surfaces over which no air (or other liquid or gas) is blowing. Solid surfaces are certainly able to exert shear stresses on fluids. How else could you have a pressure drop in flow through a tube of constant cross section? Also, if air (or other fluid or gas) is blowing over the free surface, it certainly exerts a shear stress on the fluid at the interface.

Chet
 
A.T. said:
I guess he meant net external force (forces from the fluid itself excluded) acting on the fluid at the surface.
Agreed!
Example :
If a fluid say water is put in a plastic cup and the cup is squeezed, the shape of fluid changes. Because of the force put by the hand used to squeeze cup. Here the net force of hand and gravity can be considered. :)
 
Vatsal Sanjay said:
I differ in perceiving the statement your teacher gave. The surface of the fluid is always perpendicular to the net "external" (actual plus inertial) force acting on the surface in the frame of reference of the container in which it is kept.
The external force (per unit area) acting on the free surface of a fluid is not always perpendicular to the surface. Suppose I have a shallow bowl of water filled to the brim, and I put it in a wind tunnel that blows air in the direction tangent to the surface. According to your statement, no water will blow out of the bowl, and the water surface will feel the same force per unit area as if no air were blowing.

Chet
 
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
The external force (per unit area) acting on the free surface of a fluid is not always perpendicular to the surface.
I agree. You are correct. I will reframe my statement. Whatever I said is true only for fluid statics, that is when there is no relative motion between the container and the fluid kept in it.
 
Back
Top