How to Determine the Axis of Rotation

AI Thread Summary
To determine the rotational kinetic energy of a system with two different masses attached to a massless bar and springs, the choice of axis for rotation is flexible and should be based on convenience. The total kinetic energy can be calculated by summing the kinetic energies of the individual masses, regardless of the chosen axis. The axis affects the distribution of kinetic energy into rotational and linear components but does not change the total kinetic energy. For calculations, it is beneficial to select an axis where the moment of inertia is known. Understanding the system's dynamics through Lagrangian mechanics can also aid in analyzing the potential and kinetic energies involved.
Diracobama2181
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
Let's say I have a massless bar of length ##l## with two different masses, ##m_1## and ##m_2##. Suppose an identical spring is attached to each individual mass, with the other end being attached to the ceiling. How would I go about determining the rotational kinetic energy of the system. Do I choose the axis about the center or the center of mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Diracobama2181 said:
Summary: When determining the kinetic energy of a rotating system, which point should I use as an axis to determine rotation kinetic energy.

Let's say I have a massless bar of length ##l## with two different masses, ##m_1## and ##m_2##. Suppose an identical spring is attached to each individual mass, with the other end being attached to the ceiling. How would I go about determining the rotational kinetic energy of the system. Do I choose the axis about the center or the center of mass?
If your goal is to determine the kinetic energy of the system, there is no need to bother with an axis of rotation. You have two masses. Add up their kinetic energies.
 
Diracobama2181 said:
When determining the kinetic energy of a rotating system, which point should I use as an axis to determine rotation kinetic energy.
The chosen axis merely determines how much of the kinetic energy is considered "rotational", and how much "linear". Their sum (total KE) won't change.

You should choose an axis which is most convenient. For example, the one for which you know the moment of inertia, which is needed for the rotational KE calculation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotational_energy
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444
Diracobama2181 said:
Summary: When determining the kinetic energy of a rotating system, which point should I use as an axis to determine rotation kinetic energy.

Let's say I have a massless bar of length ##l## with two different masses, ##m_1## and ##m_2##. Suppose an identical spring is attached to each individual mass, with the other end being attached to the ceiling. How would I go about determining the rotational kinetic energy of the system. Do I choose the axis about the center or the center of mass?

We can assume a flat motion system. Then we have 3 independent variables in the context of an inertial coordinate system : (x,y) for the position of the center of masses and φ for the bar's angle. From this information you can calculate the potential energy due to gravity an due to the strings and complete the Lagrangian as L=KineticEnergy-PotentialEnergy; where KineticEnergy is the sum of the kinetic energy of the center of masses plus rotational energy relative to the center of masses = 1/2 I (dφ/dt)^2 and I= moment of inertia relative to the center of masses.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top