How to Determine the Brightness of Bulbs in a New Configuration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hms.tech
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bulb Power
AI Thread Summary
To determine the brightness of bulbs in a new configuration, the relationship between power and voltage is crucial, as brightness is proportional to power. The equations P = V²/R and P = I²R can yield different results depending on the approach used. In this case, bulb "g" receives 2V, making it brighter than normal, while bulb "h" remains at normal brightness with voltage V. Clarification is sought on whether it is acceptable to rely solely on one formula for accurate results. Posting detailed calculations is recommended for verification of the findings.
hms.tech
Messages
246
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See attachment
The question asks to calculate the brightness of the bulbs(g and h) in this new configuration.


Homework Equations



Since brightness \propto Power

P= V^{2}/R
P= I^{2}R
E.M.F of One cell : V

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the equation P = V^(2)/R

Since the Voltage across "g" will be 2V and its Resistance is exactly the same as in the reference Attachment, "g" will be brighter than normal.
Similarly, since the Voltage across "h" is going to be V, "h" must be of normal brightness.

I am not sure if my answers make sense since if we apply the 2nd formula : P=R*I^2
we would get a different set of results .

Is it O.K to just rely on one of the two formulas and deduce the final answer based on say P=V^(2)/R ? Would the answers be authentic ?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    7.8 KB · Views: 452
  • Capture5.PNG
    Capture5.PNG
    2.6 KB · Views: 436
Physics news on Phys.org
hms.tech said:
I am not sure if my answers make sense since if we apply the 2nd formula : P=R*I^2
we would get a different set of results .
Not if you do it correctly. Pls post your working.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top