How to develop a Parabolic Velocity Profile in 3D tube/channel flow

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on developing a Parabolic Velocity Profile for 3D tube/channel flow, specifically transitioning from a 2D model to a 3D context. The 2D equation used is u = 1.5*Um *(1-(2y/H)^2), where Um is fluid velocity, y is the vertical position, and H is the channel width. For the 3D case, the Poiseuille flow equation is introduced, represented as u_z = (1/4μ)(dp/dz)(r^2 - R^2), where u_z is flow velocity, μ is dynamic viscosity, r is the distance from the centerline, and R is the inner radius of the tube. This establishes a parabolic velocity profile in a circular tube under steady, fully-developed laminar flow conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles
  • Familiarity with Poiseuille flow and its derivation
  • Knowledge of laminar flow characteristics
  • Basic calculus for understanding velocity profiles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Poiseuille flow equation in detail
  • Explore the application of Navier-Stokes equations in 3D flow scenarios
  • Investigate the effects of varying pressure gradients on velocity profiles
  • Learn about computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools for simulating tube flow
USEFUL FOR

Fluid dynamics engineers, researchers in hydraulic systems, and students studying advanced fluid mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

ksbiefr
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i am trying to develop a Parabolic Velocity Profile in 3D tube/channel flow. for the 2D case i use

u = 1.5*Um *(1-(2y/H)^2)
where

Um= fluid velocity
y = position of solid on "y" axis (x,y)
H = width of channel
The above equation is not possible to used for 3D case (x,y,z). i try to search for 3D case not i am not successful.

Any body suggest me a equation/formula for developing Parabolic Velocity Profile in 3D tube/channel flow.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your post is a little confusing. By 2D are you referring to flow between parallel plates, and by 3D are you referring to axial flow in a duct of circular cross section?

Chet
 
Are you familiar with how the equation you used was derived? If so, you can easily derive the equation for the velocity profile in a circular tube for a steady, fully-developed, laminar flow with constant pressure gradient. It is still parabolic. The flow is called Poiseuille flow. I won't go through the derivation, but here is the velocity profile for a circular tube:
u_z = \dfrac{1}{4\mu}\dfrac{dp}{dz}(r^2 -R^2).

Here, ##u_z## is the flow velocity, ##\mu## is the dynamic viscosity, ##r## is the distance from the centerline, ##R## is the inner radius of the tube, and ##dp/dz## is the pressure gradient through the tube.
 
boneh3ad said:
Are you familiar with how the equation you used was derived? If so, you can easily derive the equation for the velocity profile in a circular tube for a steady, fully-developed, laminar flow with constant pressure gradient. It is still parabolic. The flow is called Poiseuille flow. I won't go through the derivation, but here is the velocity profile for a circular tube:
u_z = \dfrac{1}{4\mu}\dfrac{dp}{dz}(r^2 -R^2).

Here, ##u_z## is the flow velocity, ##\mu## is the dynamic viscosity, ##r## is the distance from the centerline, ##R## is the inner radius of the tube, and ##dp/dz## is the pressure gradient through the tube.
To expand on what boneh3ad has said, that axial velocity can also be expressed in the same form as your "2D" equation (in terms of the mean velocity) by writing:

##u_z=2u_m\left(1-(\frac{r}{R})^2\right)##

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
25K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K