How to draw self-energy diagrams in phi^4 theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dixanadu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagrams Theory
Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2
Okay guys so I the lagrangian

\mathcal{L}=\dfrac{1}{2}\left( \partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi-m^{2}\phi^{2} \right)+\dfrac{\lambda}{4!}:\phi(x)^{4}:

where \phi(x) is a real scalar field.

I want to know how you can draw the self-energy diagrams at order \lambda and \lambda^{2} for a 2 => 2 scattering system. How do you go about doing this just by looking at the Lagrangian?

Thanks guys...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, what do you mean by self-energy? Usually one calls self-energy the higher-order corrections to the single particle propagator, i.e. a 1 -> 1 process. Here you have 2 initial particle and 2 final one. What do you define as self-energy?
However, in the most general way possible, since your interaction term is ##\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^4##, this means that this theory admits vertices with 4 legs (shaped like an X, if you want). Each X counts as ##\lambda##.
In your case the basics 2 -> 2 process simply happens when you have one particle at each leg of the X. This is a order ##\lambda## diagram, the only allowed for the considered scattering. If you want to go to order ##\lambda^2## then you have two possibilities:

1) Take the order ##\lambda## diagram just mentioned and you add a "bubble" to one of the external leg. Meaning, that one of the legs emits and reabsorbs a particle at the same point (you essentially join two of the legs of your X together). You can do this for each of the four legs. This is what I would call the self-energy correction to your tree level 2 -> 2 scattering.
2) You can also take two X and join two of their legs together, so that you end up with a bubble with 4 total external legs (two coming from the same point on one side and two coming from the same point on the other side). This is again order ##\lambda^2## but it doesn't strictly contain any self-energy.

Is this what you were looking for?
 
First of all you have to correct the sign of your interaction term, because otherwise there wouldn't be a stable ground state and all calculations in perturbation theory obsolete!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top