How to estimate a function that fit well with a curve

gibnem
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hello
somme one know how to get the function that fit well with a curve
following is my curve:
[PLAIN]http://img814.imageshack.us/img814/5885/tempdepth.png

thx..:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOESS" ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yeh it could be...

i could create a function that fit very well withe that graph just in excel with a fourth polynomiale and i get the numerical expresion
but withe some other graphe with more variation the polynomiale function don't fit very good so I'm looking if i can found a softwar thar use other methodes (moving average, exp, or a mix of this methodes) to get a better curve fitting)
 
A polynomial is not going to deal well with either the nearly vertical part at high depths, or the nearly horizontal part at low depths. You might be able to fix that with an appropriate coordinate transformation, but a generic method like LOESS will likely produce better results with less effort.
 
Here is a link to an Excel add-in that claims to have LOESS capability.

http://www.fileguru.com/Data-Curve-Fit-Creator-Add-in/download

If I were doing this I'd consider some form of parametric cubic polynomials (e.g. Bezier) because they can handle vertical slopes.
 
Last edited:
oooh thank you hotvette
that give a really a very very good fitting
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top