How to express vector in sigma notation

AI Thread Summary
A vector A can be expressed in sigma notation as ∑ Ai, where i ranges from 1 to 3, representing the x, y, and z coordinates. To express vector A in polar form using sigma notation, basis vectors er, eθ, and eφ are used. Each of these basis vectors corresponds to a direction in polar coordinates, with r having a length dimension, while θ and φ are angles. The components of the vector in these directions are denoted as a, b, and c, which are independent of the polar coordinates. Understanding these components and their relationships is essential for proper vector representation in polar form.
reckon
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A vector A, can be expressed in sigma notation as
\sum Ai where i runs from 1 to 3, i.e. A1 for x coordinate, A2 for y coordinate and A3 for z coordinate.

I wonder how to express vector A in polar form using sigma notation. Could anyone share their knowledge to me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi reckon ! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have a sigma: ∑ :wink:)
reckon said:
A vector A, can be expressed in sigma notation as
\sum Ai where i runs from 1 to 3, i.e. A1 for x coordinate, A2 for y coordinate and A3 for z coordinate.

No, it's ∑ Aiei, where the {ei} are basis vectors.
I wonder how to express vector A in polar form using sigma notation. Could anyone share their knowledge to me?

You'd need to use the basis vectors er eθ and eφ.

But these are different at each point, and at the origin they aren't even defined.
 
Hahaha.. thanks tiny-tim for ∑ and you even provided with "for copying-pasting" in your signature.

But I'm still a bit unsure because for eθ eφ, we only have angle which doesn't have dimension, isn't it? Can we make them as component of a vector?

A=rer + θeθ + φeφ
where r have length dimension while θ and φ have no dimension?
 
Hi reckon! :smile:
reckon said:
But I'm still a bit unsure because for eθ eφ, we only have angle which doesn't have dimension, isn't it? Can we make them as component of a vector?

A=rer + θeθ + φeφ
where r have length dimension while θ and φ have no dimension?

ah … you obviously haven't come across these before …

no, er eθ and eφ are all unit vectors (with magnitude one), in the directions of increasing r, increasing θ, and increasing φ, respectively …

so they all have length dimension.

(it is traditional to use the symbol e for unit vectors)

A vector starting at the position (r,θ,φ) will be written as aer + beθ + ceφ, and a b and c have nothing to do with (r,θ,φ), they are simply the components of the vector in each of the three (perpendicular) directions. :smile:

(this would be easier to follow with a diagram, but unfortunately, I can't find a good one, in wikipedia or anywhere else :redface:)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
996
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
646
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top