MHB How to find a general solution to sec2 2x = 1– tan 2x

AI Thread Summary
To find a general solution for the equation sec²(2x) = 1 - tan(2x), the Pythagorean identity sec²(θ) = tan²(θ) + 1 is applied, leading to the rearranged equation tan²(2x) + tan(2x) = 0. This can be factored into tan(2x)(tan(2x) + 1) = 0, indicating two potential solutions: tan(2x) = 0 or tan(2x) = -1. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing trigonometric identities in solving such equations. Overall, the collaborative effort successfully guides the user toward the solution.
arejet
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

My name is Arijit Biswas. I have resumed learning maths after a long time and I am stuck with a simple problem in trigonometry.

I need to find a general solution to the equation: sec2 2x = 1– tan 2x. I have worked out something i.e.
1) Multiply by cos2 2x and that makes the equation to: 1 = cos2 2x - sin 2x.cos 2x
2) 1 = cos 2x (cos 2x - sin 2x)
3) Thereafter I expand all terms but I do not find the solutions

Could anybody please help?

Thanks a lot in advance!

Regards,
Arijit
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Arijit!

We are given to solve:

$$\sec^2(2x)=1-\tan(2x)$$

I would begin by applying the Pythagorean identity $$\sec^2(\theta)=\tan^2(\theta)+1$$ so that we now have:

$$\tan^2(2x)+1=1-\tan(2x)$$

Now, arrange as:

$$\tan^2(2x)+\tan(2x)=0$$

Factor:

$$\tan(2x)\left(\tan(2x)+1\right)=0$$

Can you proceed?
 
MarkFL said:
Hello Arijit!

We are given to solve:

$$\sec^2(2x)=1-\tan(2x)$$

I would begin by applying the Pythagorean identity $$\sec^2(\theta)=\tan^2(\theta)+1$$ so that we now have:

$$\tan^2(2x)+1=1-\tan(2x)$$

Now, arrange as:

$$\tan^2(2x)+\tan(2x)=0$$

Factor:

$$\tan(2x)\left(\tan(2x)+1\right)=0$$

Can you proceed?

Hi there,

Thank you so much for the solution. You wouldn't believe, but I was just looking at the Pythagorean identity you used to solve the equation. However it didn't occur to me. How silly! Thanks a lot again!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top