How to find acceleration or displacement with respect to time?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding acceleration or displacement with respect to time using the equation a(x) = kx + 1, where acceleration is defined as the second derivative of displacement with respect to time. The resulting ordinary differential equation (ODE) is expressed as \ddot{x} - kx - 1 = 0, which is nonhomogeneous due to the constant term. To solve this ODE, one must establish the associated characteristic equation, which will yield solutions that are either linear combinations of real or complex exponentials, depending on the sign of k. Participants discuss the importance of keeping the nonhomogeneous part on the right-hand side of the equation. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical approach to solving the ODE for acceleration and displacement.
sid_galt
Messages
502
Reaction score
1
<br /> a(x)= kx + 1<br />
where a(x) is acceleration with respect to displacement along the x-axis and x is the displacement itself while k is the constant.

How to find acceleration or displacement with respect to time?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Use the definition of acceleration to write the ODE.Depending on that sign of "k",the answer for x(t) is a linear comb.of complex or real exponentials...

Daniel.
 
Plus a constant (the ODE is nonhomogenous).

Daniel.
 
I can't figure out the ODE. Can you help me?
 
sid_galt said:
<br /> a(x)= kx + 1<br />
where a(x) is acceleration with respect to displacement along the x-axis and x is the displacement itself while k is the constant.

How to find acceleration or displacement with respect to time?

acceleration is the second derivative of x wtr to time :

\ddot{x} = kx + 1

\ddot{x} -kx -1 = 0

Can you solve it from here. You will need to set up the associated caracteristic equation and based upon the sign of k you will get a linear combination of exponentials or complex exponentials

marlon
 
The nonhomogeneity part is usually left in the RHS...

Daniel.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top