How to find an unknown amount (titration)

  • Thread starter Thread starter hhs15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Titration
AI Thread Summary
To determine the unknown amount of NaH_2PO_4, first identify the reaction that occurs during the titration with NaOH, which is a neutralization reaction. The balanced equation for the reaction is NaH_2PO_4 + NaOH → Na2HPO4 + H2O. Using the volume and concentration of NaOH used (22 mL of 0.1 M), calculate the moles of NaOH, which will equal the moles of NaH_2PO_4 reacted. Since only 25 mL of the diluted solution was titrated, scale the moles of NaH_2PO_4 to find the total amount in the original 250 mL solution. This process will yield the unknown concentration of NaH_2PO_4 in the original solution.
hhs15
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm given an unknown amount (around 20mL) of NaH_2PO_4 and I dilute it in distilled water in a 250mL flask. Then I take 25mL of this solution and add 4 drops of thymolphthalein in another flask. Then I titrate it with 0.1M of NaOH until it becoms light blue. I used 22mL of NaOH.

I'm suppose to find out the amount of NaH_2PO_4 I was given.
I'm lost. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh of course. I knew it was eazy.
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top