How to Find and Classify the Singular Point for f(z)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swati Jain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    singularity
Swati Jain
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find and classify the singular point for
f(z) = 1/ ( sin z - sin a)
Where a is an arbitrary real constant.

Homework Equations


f(z) = 1/ ( sin z - sin a)
Where a is an arbitrary real constant.

The Attempt at a Solution


There will be infinite number of singularities of sin z = sin a
Put z' = z-a
Denominator can be written as sin z - sin a = sin ( z'+ a) - sin a
= sin a cos z' + cos a sin z' - sin a = sin a ( cos z' - 1) + cos a sin z'
= sin a ( -1/2! Z'^ 2 + 1/4! Z'^ 4 + ...) + cos a ( z' - z'^ 3/3! +...)
= cos a z' - 1/2! Sin a z'^2 -...
Now how to define a and singularities ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What if you look at the solution set to the problem:
##\sin a = \sin z##.
 
RUber said:
What if you look at the solution set to the problem:
##\sin a = \sin z##.
I thought in this way too.. But I could not find how to find relation between z and a. It may be z = a + 2n pi, But I am not sure. And further I don"t understand that how to find singularity in this case. Thanks for your response.
 
Maybe you can use the formula for a difference of sines:

##\sin z - \sin a = 2\sin(\frac{z-a} {2})\cos(\frac{z+a} {2})##
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top