MHB How to Find Cosine from Secant Using Trig Identities?

courtbits
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
If $$\cos(\pi/3)= \frac{1}{2}$$, find $$\sec(\pi-\pi/3)$$

Someone really give me step-by-step explanation.
I really don't know what identity to use, and no idea how to get cosine to secant.
Please, it would help. I do have more questions if you help me dissect this problem. XD
Thanks so much in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
courtbits said:
If $$\cos(\pi/3)= \frac{1}{2}$$, find $$\sec(\pi-\pi/3)$$

Someone really give me step-by-step explanation.
I really don't know what identity to use, and no idea how to get cosine to secant.
Please, it would help. I do have more questions if you help me dissect this problem. XD
Thanks so much in advance!

No idea how to get cosine from secant? By DEFINITION the secant is the reciprocal of the cosine...

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{1}{\cos{(x)}} \equiv \sec{(x)} \end{align*}$
 
Prove It said:
No idea how to get cosine from secant? By DEFINITION the secant is the reciprocal of the cosine...

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{1}{\cos{(x)}} \equiv \sec{(x)} \end{align*}$

Ok..
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top