How to Find Functions for Constant Arc Length with Varying Amplitude and Period?

JonF
Messages
621
Reaction score
1
I want to find two functions f(n,x) and g(n,x) such that f(n,x)sin(g(n,x)) always has a constant arc length over some interval [a,b]. Where n increases the amplitude but decreases the period.

Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, you've got the trivial choice f(n,x)=\frac{1}{\sin(g(n,x)}

In the general case, the arc-length will be a function of "n".
Can you set up a differential equation for f and g which ensures that the arc-length is just the constant function?
 
I did set up a DE. That’s how I know they have to be f(n,x) not just f(n)

If they were…
f(x) = g(n)sin(x*p(n))
f’(x) = g(n)p(n)cos(x*p(n))

So arch length is:

\int_{0}^{1} \sqrt{{1+ (g(n)p(n)cos(p(n)) )^2} dx =c

Differentiate
1+ (g(n)p(n)cos(p(n)))^2 – (1+ (g(n)p(n))^2) = 0

(g(n)p(n)cos(p(n)))^2 = (g(n)p(n))^2)

cos(p(n)) = 1

p(n) = 0

So I know if they were just functions of just n it would be trivial. For functions of x and n (possibly I will need to put a and b in there also) I know how to set up the de, no clue how to solve it.
 
Have you already tried separation of variables to transform your partial DE into an ordinary DE?

What I mean is assume g(x,n) = X(x)*N(n).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top