How to find maximum change in the following scenario?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PatternSeeker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Maximum
PatternSeeker
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I need directions regarding methods that I could use for the following type of problem:

I am given the following scenario:

Observers consistently estimate objects as 20% shorter than they really are in the "y" dimension. They accurately estimate objects in the "x" dimension.

** error in estimated lengths in the y dimension, % error y = -20 % of physical lengths.
** error in estimated lengths in the x-dimension, % error x = 0% of physical length

Observers also consistently overestimate physical angles between "x" dimension and directions between "x" and "y" dimension.

Let physical angle = σ
Let estimated angle = β

** angle β = arctan ((sin α (% error x + 100))/(cos α ( % error y + 100))

*** Angles α and β vary between 0 deg to 90 degrees. The change between the
two is not constant, however. It will be greatest at a particular value of angle α.


QUESTION: If the physical length y is underestimated by 20 %, at which physical angle α
(between 0 and 90 degrees) will the change between angle β and angle α be
the greatest?

How would you suggest I approach this problem? Should I use differential calculus?

By the way, my background in math is pretty basic - I took undergraduate calculus a few years ago.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
PatternSeeker said:
I need directions regarding methods that I could use for the following type of problem:

I am given the following scenario:

Observers consistently estimate objects as 20% shorter than they really are in the "y" dimension. They accurately estimate objects in the "x" dimension.

** error in estimated lengths in the y dimension, % error y = -20 % of physical lengths.
** error in estimated lengths in the x-dimension, % error x = 0% of physical length

Observers also consistently overestimate physical angles between "x" dimension and directions between "x" and "y" dimension.

Let physical angle = σ
Let estimated angle = β

** angle β = arctan ((sin α (% error x + 100))/(cos α ( % error y + 100))

*** Angles α and β vary between 0 deg to 90 degrees. The change between the
two is not constant, however. It will be greatest at a particular value of angle α.QUESTION: If the physical length y is underestimated by 20 %, at which physical angle α
(between 0 and 90 degrees) will the change between angle β and angle α be
the greatest?

How would you suggest I approach this problem? Should I use differential calculus?

By the way, my background in math is pretty basic - I took undergraduate calculus a few years ago.
Yes, differential calculus is the right approach to take. If it has been a while since you used it, you may need a reminder that the maximum or minimum of a differentiable function is at an end point of the function domain (in this case ##\alpha \in [0, 90\deg]##) or at a point where its derivative is zero (stationary point). So you will need to write an expression for the difference between ##\beta## and ##\alpha## and differentiate it to find a stationary point, and then check to see if it is a maximum or a minimum (or neither).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top