How to Find Surface Area of a Circle with Removed Sector | Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter mitz_fitz
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find the surface area of a circle after removing a sector, first calculate the area of the full circle using the formula πr², where the radius is 750mm. The sector removed has an angle of 36 degrees, which represents 1/10 of the circle's total area. Therefore, the area of the removed sector is (π/10)r². The remaining area is then calculated as πr² - (π/10)r², simplifying to (9/10)πr². The final formula for the net area after the sector removal is (9/10)π(750mm)².
mitz_fitz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
if some people could please allow me to bounce answers off them and show them my work by means of e-mail before I send it away to be marked, it would be highly appreciated, thanks

one problem I have at the moment is I need to find the surface area of a circle after a sector has been removed
the circle has a radius of 750mm and the segment is 36 degrees wide at the edge of the circle

thanks,
reuben

contact me directly mitz_fitz@hotmail.com
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Removing a sector of a circle with an arc of 36 degrees gives 9/10 the area of the full circle. 36 degrees is (360-36)/360 = 324/360 = 9/10. Thus the net area is

\pi r^2 - \frac{\pi}{10} r^2 with r = 750mm.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top