How to find the acceleration of two objects on a pulley system

  • Thread starter Thread starter pureouchies4717
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the acceleration of two masses in a pulley system, specifically focusing on the relationship between the masses and their accelerations. The problem involves concepts from mechanics, including tension, acceleration, and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various equations and relationships between the masses and their accelerations, questioning the validity of their approaches. Some discuss the implications of neglecting friction and the relationship between the speeds of the two masses.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different methods to derive the acceleration, with participants offering corrections and alternative perspectives. Some participants express confusion over their calculations and seek further clarification on the relationships involved.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions include neglecting friction and considering the rope to be massless. Participants are also grappling with the implications of these assumptions on tension and acceleration in the system.

pureouchies4717
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
i willl leave out the numbers to make this go more smoothly


knight_Figure_08_40.jpg


find the acceleration of m1

heres what i thought:

(m2/(m1+m2))g= a

but this is wrong. can you guys please help me out. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
friction is neglected
 
Note that the rope length increases on BOTH sides of m2 equally.
Thus, in order for the TOTAL length of ropes to remain constant, the speed of m2 must be HALF of the speed of m1
 
thanks for helping me, but I am still getting the wrong answer. after what you said, i realized that the tension of m(m2), too, had to be 1/2 of the tension of M (m1)

so here's how i did it this time:

a= (2(m)g)/(M-2m)

this is also wrong
 
Yes, that's wrong.
Here's a correct way.
Let m1's velocity (and acceleration) be positive, m2's velocity (and acceleration) be negative.
The SPEED of m2 is half that m1's, that is the velocities are related v2=-v1/2

There is conservation of mechanical energy, so we have:
[tex]\frac{1}{2}m_{1}v_{1}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}m_{2}v_{2}^{2}+m_{2}gz=C[/tex]
Differentiating, we get:
[tex]m_{1}v_{1}a_{1}+m_{2}v_{2}a_{2}+m_{2}gv_{2}=0[/tex]
Note that our choice of v2 negative implies the correct loss of potential energy.

By using the relation between the velocities (and accelerations), we get, by dividing with v1/2:
[tex](2m_{1}+\frac{m_{2}}{2})a_{1}=m_{2}g[/tex]
that is:
[tex]a_{1}=\frac{2m_{2}g}{4m_{1}+m_{2}}[/tex]
 
thanks arildno :!)

:cool:
 
nick727kcin said:
thanks for helping me, but I am still getting the wrong answer. after what you said, i realized that the tension of m(m2), too, had to be 1/2 of the tension of M (m1)

so here's how i did it this time:

a= (2(m)g)/(M-2m)

this is also wrong
OOPS!
What you say about the tension is totally wrong!
Since the rope is assumed massless, and there is no friction, the tension must be the same THROUGHOUT the rope!

Here's how you should to this from F=ma:
For m1, we have:
[tex]T=m_{1}a_{1}[/tex]
For m2, consider the system of the mass plus the half-circle arc of massless rope around it, with vertical ends of rope.
Since the rope is massless, we get the equation for the system's C.M:
[tex]T+T-m_{2}g=m_{2}a_{2}+0*a_{rope}\to{2T}-m_{2}g=-m_{2}\frac{a_{1}}{2}[/tex]
Eliminating the tension in the last equation by using the first equation reproduces the result in the previous post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
Replies
23
Views
3K