How to find the k constant of a spring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rss14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Spring
AI Thread Summary
To find the k constant of a spring, the discussion revolves around using energy conservation principles, specifically comparing gravitational potential energy and elastic potential energy. The user is uncertain whether kinetic energy should be included in their calculations and presents two equations to evaluate. They calculated a k constant of 2.752 N/m, which they question as potentially too small, given the spring's equilibrium length of 0.04m. Additionally, they calculated a force of 0.09632 N at a compression of 0.035m and are concerned about the validity of their method. The conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of energy components in determining the spring constant accurately.
rss14
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
EDIT: I just found the homework board, mods: don't bother moving this thread, just delete it. Thanks

We had a lab where we launch springs with an unknown k constant to a target 2.01m away and 0.22m high. We also know the angle at which we shot the spring.

We need to find the k constant of the spring, so my question is, does the kinetic energy matter?

Will the equation be:

Eg + Ee = Eg + Ek (The spring had gravitational potential as it was launched a bit higher than the reference position (the table)

or

Eg + Ee = EgThanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I did the Eg + Ee = Eg method, then my k constant turned out to be 2.752 N/m.

The spring's length at equilibrium is 0.04m; the spring is quite tiny.

Does this k constant seem to small?
 
Also, using F= kx, the force contained in the spring when x = 0.035m, is 0.09632N

Are these values too small, which could possibly hint the method I tried is wrong?
 
Last edited:
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top