How to find the mass-energy in a certain field

  • Thread starter Thread starter Positron137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the "mass-energy" associated with a charged particle's electrostatic field using the integral M = ∫E^2 dV, where E is the electric field and the bounds are from R to infinity. This integral is justified as it reflects the energy stored in the electric field, a fundamental concept in classical electromagnetism. The term "mass-energy" can be confusing, but it relates to the mass-energy equivalence principle from special relativity, where energy can be viewed as a form of mass. Understanding this relationship clarifies how energy is stored in electric fields and the implications for charged particles. The conversation emphasizes the connection between electric fields and energy storage in physics.
Positron137
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
How to find the "mass-energy" in a certain field

I saw somewhere that for a charged particle of radius R, the method of finding the "mass-energy" in such an electrostatic field (caused by the charged particle is)

M = ∫E^2 dV, where E is the electric field of the particle, and the bounds of the integral are from R to infinity. Can someone justify why this integral is correct? Thanks!

P.S. What exactly does "mass-energy" mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Positron137 said:
I saw somewhere that for a charged particle of radius R, the method of finding the "mass-energy" in such an electrostatic field (caused by the charged particle is)

M = ∫E^2 dV, where E is the electric field of the particle, and the bounds of the integral are from R to infinity. Can someone justify why this integral is correct? Thanks!

P.S. What exactly does "mass-energy" mean?
"Mass-energy" is a somewhat confusing way of thinking about what's going on here, but it's not wrong.

First, an electrical field does store energy. This is basic classical E&M; the easiest way to get at the relationship between electrical field and stored energy is to consider two infinite parallel charged plates, see how much work it takes to change the distance between them and how the field changes as a result.

Second, and somewhat independent of this exercise in classical E&M, we have the mass-energy equivalence implied by special relativity: ##E=mc^2##, which allows us to talk about the combined mass-energy of a system - "total energy" might be clearer, as the mass is just another way of storing energy and vice versa.
 
Ok. That makes much more sense. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top