How to find the pH of HCl and NaOH combined.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sjm757
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hcl Ph
AI Thread Summary
To find the pH of a solution resulting from titrating 0.100 mL of 0.100 M HCl with 0.100 M NaOH, one must calculate the total volume of the solution and the moles of HCl remaining after each addition of NaOH. The initial concentration of hydronium ions can be determined using the formula pH = -log[H3O+], where [H3O+] is the concentration of hydronium ions. It's important to note that pH is not simply the negative logarithm of the acid concentration, as this can lead to inaccuracies in calculations. Understanding the water ion product is crucial, as it applies to all solutions regardless of dilution. Mastery of these concepts will aid in accurately determining the pH throughout the titration process.
Sjm757
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have .100mL of .100M HCl titrated with .100M NaOH, Theres a chart I have to fill in and I'm completely lost. I have the volume of NaOH(from 0ml-200ml) I have to find the total volume of the solution, I get that, moles remaining of solution molarity of remaining solution the hydronium ion concentration the OH concentration and the pH


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


0.00mL of NaOH added, so the volume is .01L, the moles remaining would also be .01 because 100mL*.100M HCl, the pH is just -log.01 then, resulting in 2. I don't know how to get the Hydronium ion concentration or concentration of OH, any help is welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I read the water ion product, that would apply to solutions not diluted?
 
It applies to all solutions.

But you should start learning about hydronium and pH. In general pH is NOT minus log of the acid concentration (even if in some specific circumstances it can be calculated this way).
 
I talked to my teacher and he just wanted us to find the pH as the -log way. But I got it, thank you for the help
 
I don't see how you were able to solve the problem using incorrect pH definition. Can you elaborate?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top