How to Find the X Component of a Vector | Decomposing Vectors Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
AI Thread Summary
To find the x component of a vector with a magnitude of 6 m pointing 35 degrees north of west, the cosine function can be applied using two methods. One approach involves calculating -(6 m)cos(35), resulting in -4.9 m, while the other uses (6 m)cos(145), also yielding -4.9 m. Both methods are valid, but it's suggested to use the first method and apply the negative sign directly when necessary. Understanding cardinal angles can help clarify the direction, but memorizing them isn't essential. Ultimately, consistency in approach is key for solving similar problems.
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


The magnitude of the vector is 6 m, and points 35 degrees north of west. Find the x component of the vector.

Homework Equations



x = |R|cos(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution



I am confused about what degrees to input into the cosine function. I know that the vector is pointing 35 degrees north of west, which means that the x component will be negative, but there are two ways I could do it am I am not sure which one I should do. First, I could tack on a negative and calculate -(6 m)cos35 = -4.9 m. Another way is not tack on a negative and calculate (6 m)cos145 = -4.9 m. Which method is better, and which one should I use on a regular basis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both ways are fine, as long as you don't try to memorize a rule and blindly apply it. Personally, I like the first approach, and just tack on the negative sign when I know there should be one.
 
Mr Davis 97 said:

Homework Statement


The magnitude of the vector is 6 m, and points 35 degrees north of west. Find the x component of the vector.

Homework Equations



x = |R|cos(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution



I am confused about what degrees to input into the cosine function. I know that the vector is pointing 35 degrees north of west, which means that the x component will be negative, but there are two ways I could do it am I am not sure which one I should do. First, I could tack on a negative and calculate -(6 m)cos35 = -4.9 m. Another way is not tack on a negative and calculate (6 m)cos145 = -4.9 m. Which method is better, and which one should I use on a regular basis?
Well, you could learn the angles for the cardinal points of the compass, but why do that when you can just make something up?

East = 0°
North = 90°
West = 180°
South = 270°
 
SteamKing said:
Well, you could learn the angles for the cardinal points of the compass, but why do that when you can just make something up?

East = 0°
North = 90°
West = 180°
South = 270°

Huh?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Huh?
You've never seen the following diagram (or a similar one)?:
ucad.gif
It should have been used when you studied trigonometry.

After all,
cos (0°) = 1.0
sin (0°) = 0.0

cos (90°) = 0.0
sin (90°) = 1.0

cos (180°) = -1.0
sin (180°) = 0.0

cos (270°) = 0.0
sin (270°)= -1.0

etc., etc.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top