How to find verify solution to differential equation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
digipony
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See attached photo

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't even know where to start on this problem. Usually, if I am given a possible solution to a DE, say y(t)=cos(t) as a solution to y''-y'+y=sin(t), I find whether it was a solution or not by manipulating it and then plugging it into the second equation that it may be a solution to and then seeing whether the resulting statement is true. For the ex. problem I give in this section, I would do this:
y'= -sint
y''= -cost
then sub them in: -cost +sint +cost = sint
and by simplifying get: sint = sint
so for this case, it y=cost is a solution.
But with the problem that is in the attached photo I have no idea what to do.

Does anyone have an guidance as to how I can solve the attached problem?
Thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • diffeq.JPG
    diffeq.JPG
    12.7 KB · Views: 596
Physics news on Phys.org
digipony said:

Homework Statement



See attached photo

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I don't even know where to start on this problem. Usually, if I am given a possible solution to a DE, say y(t)=cos(t) as a solution to y''-y'+y=sin(t), I find whether it was a solution or not by manipulating it and then plugging it into the second equation that it may be a solution to and then seeing whether the resulting statement is true. For the ex. problem I give in this section, I would do this:
y'= -sint
y''= -cost
then sub them in: -cost +sint +cost = sint
and by simplifying get: sint = sint
so for this case, it y=cost is a solution.
But with the problem that is in the attached photo I have no idea what to do.

Does anyone have an guidance as to how I can solve the attached problem?
Thanks :)
Here's the "photo":

attachment.php?attachmentid=50458&d=1346730413.jpg


Well, find [itex]\displaystyle \frac{\partial}{\partial x} f(x-ct)[/itex] and then the partial with respect to x of that.

Do the same with partials with respect to t.

Then plug all that in.
 
I don't have much experience with partial derivatives, am I on the right track here: the first partial derivative with respect to x, [tex]\displaystyle\frac{\partial}{\partial x} f(x-ct)[/tex] be: 1, therefore the second would be 0?
 
Sorry for the formatting on that, I had not even heard of LateX before finding this site.
Oh never mind this, it's fixed.
 
Last edited:
digipony said:
I don't have much experience with partial derivatives, am I on the right track here: the first partial derivative with respect to x, [tex]\displaystyle\frac{\partial}{\partial x} f(x-ct)[/tex] be: 1, therefore the second would be 0?

No.

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{\partial}{\partial x} f(x-ct) = (1)\cdot f'(x-ct)\,,[/itex] because d/dx (x) = 1 .

Similarly [itex]\displaystyle \frac{\partial}{\partial t} f(x-ct) = (-c)\cdot f'(x-ct)\,.[/itex]
 
Oh, so that's what the reference to chain rule was about! Thank you! :smile: