How to generally express a shifted PDF ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikozm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pdf
nikozm
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hello,

i am trying to solve the following.

Given a general PDF (i.e., fx(x), where x ≥ 0), how can i express the PDF of y = c x in terms of fx(x)?

I think that goes like this: fy(y) = fx(y/c)/c, but i 'm not sure.

Any help would be useful.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nikozm, it's best to work with the CDF and then convert to the PDF. Let
F(x) = \int_{0}^{x} f_x(t) dt

Then
P(y<M) = P(cx < M) = P(x < M/c) = F(M/c)
So
P(y<M) = \int_{0}^{M/c} f_x(t) dt
To find the pdf you just need to do some manipulations to the integral so that you have an \int_{0}^{M}, alternatively you can differentiate with respect to M to get the PDF.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top