How to get valid frequency for a transfer function?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the half-power frequency for a given transfer function, H(s) = 1/(s^2+s+1). Participants explore the concept of the -3 dB point and its significance in determining valid frequency values, while addressing various interpretations and calculations related to complex frequency.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents multiple frequency values derived from the transfer function but expresses uncertainty about which values are valid and why.
  • Several participants question the accuracy of the initial calculations and suggest that the -3 dB point, or half-power frequency, is crucial for determining valid frequencies.
  • There is a discussion about the interpretation of complex frequency and whether negative frequencies should be considered valid in the context of real-valued signals.
  • Another participant clarifies that the -3 dB point corresponds to a frequency where the gain decreases by 3 dB from its maximum value.
  • Some participants express confusion over the correct method for calculating the half-power frequency and whether to use subtraction of 3 dB or a factor of 1/sqrt(2) in their calculations.
  • One participant ultimately concludes that only the positive frequency component is valid, but this is contingent on the instructor's expectations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach consensus on the validity of the calculated frequencies, with multiple competing views on how to interpret and calculate the half-power frequency. There is ongoing uncertainty regarding the correct approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention that the calculations were done roughly, indicating potential limitations in their accuracy. The discussion also highlights the dependence on definitions related to complex frequency and the interpretation of negative frequency components.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying control systems, signal processing, or related fields, particularly those interested in transfer functions and frequency analysis.

Effy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


transfer function: H(s) = 1/(s^2+s+1).
question: compute half-power frequency

Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]I got 4 answers: -0.605i, 0.065i, -1.169, 1.169
I know that only two of these are correct, one is 1.169 instead of -1.169 because frequency cannot be negative. Then I wrote the two imaginary answers into phaser form. I got 0.065<-90degree and 0.065<90 degree. Could someone tell me which phase I should choose and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you come up with those answers yourself, or were they given to you in the problem statement? If they're your work, then it would be much easier to help you if you showed how you came up with them.

The value of 's' is, in some contexts, called 'complex frequency', but I doubt that's what you're after. I think you probably just have to find the -3 dB point(s) of ##H(j \omega)##.
 
milesyoung said:
Did you come up with those answers yourself, or were they given to you in the problem statement? If they're your work, then it would be much easier to help you if you showed how you came up with them.

The value of 's' is, in some contexts, called 'complex frequency', but I doubt that's what you're after. I think you probably just have to find the -3 dB point(s) of ##H(j \omega)##.

Hi,

I wrote the transfer function H(s) into H(w)=1/(-w^2+iw+1)
so the magnitude would be |H(w)|=|1/(-w^2+iw+1)|=1/sqrt(1-w^2+w^4)
|H(w)|max would be sqrt(4/3) when 1-w^2+w^4 is at minimum when w=+ or -1/sqrt(2)
set |H(w)|=1/sqrt(1-w^2+w^4)=1/sqrt(2)*|H(w)|max=sqrt(2/3) and solve for w
since this is a 4th order equation, I got 4 answers. 1 imaginary positive, 1 imaginary negative, 1 real positive, 1 real negative.
Then I'm confused.

What do you mean by -3dB point? I don't know about that.
 
@Effy , i think the answers you calculated are wrong. Please go through it once again.
 
milesyoung said:
Did you come up with those answers yourself, or were they given to you in the problem statement? If they're your work, then it would be much easier to help you if you showed how you came up with them.

The value of 's' is, in some contexts, called 'complex frequency', but I doubt that's what you're after. I think you probably just have to find the -3 dB point(s) of ##H(j \omega)##.

Btw, the original question is a damper-spring-mass system. I got the transfer function from that and I'm pretty sure it's correct.
 
-3db point is called as the cutoff frequency or half power frequency. It is a frequency at which magnitude of gain decreases by 3db from maximum gain.
 
lazyaditya said:
@Effy , i think the answers you calculated are wrong. Please go through it once again.

I've done that several times and I'm still try
lazyaditya said:
-3db point is called as the cutoff frequency or half power frequency. It is a frequency at which magnitude of gain decreases by 3db from maximum gain.

Does it mean that I shouldn't multiply the maximum magnitude by 1/sqrt(2) but subtract 3dB?
 
I meant about the frequency values.
 
I did it roughly .
 

Attachments

  • photo(1).JPG
    photo(1).JPG
    27.2 KB · Views: 476
  • #10
You can subtract 3 db only when the magnitude is also given in decibel .
 

Attachments

  • photo 2(1).JPG
    photo 2(1).JPG
    34.7 KB · Views: 502
  • photo 1(1).JPG
    photo 1(1).JPG
    29.4 KB · Views: 517
  • #11
lazyaditya said:
I did it roughly .

I got the same answers and finally found out what I did wrong. Thank you so much!
But only the +1.27 is a valid frequency, right?
 
  • #12
Effy said:
But only the +1.27 is a valid frequency, right?
That depends on how pedantic your instructor is. You can interpret the real-valued signal ##\cos(\omega t)## as a complex-valued signal:
$$
\cos(\omega t) = \frac{e^{j \omega t} + e^{-j \omega t}}{2}
$$
with frequency components at ##-\omega## and ##\omega##, but I doubt that makes any difference for your assignment. The negative frequency components are redundant if you're only working with real-valued signals, so I think you can easily argue that it's correct to only include the positive frequency component in your answer.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
milesyoung said:
That depends on how pedantic your instructor is. You can interpret the real-valued signal ##\cos(\omega t)## as a complex-valued signal:
$$
\cos(\omega t) = \frac{e^{j \omega t} + e^{-j \omega t}}{2}
$$
with frequency components at ##-\omega## and ##\omega##, but I doubt that makes any difference for your assignment. The negative frequency components are redundant if you're only working with real-valued signals, so I think you can easily argue that it's correct to only include the positive frequency component in your answer.

Got it. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K