I How to index single crystal Bragg peaks

Hello890
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I am able to find methods on how to index Bragg peaks for powder diffraction, and was wondering if the method is the same for single cubic crystals of NaCl? I have tried and cannot get the expected sequence of allowed reflections for cubic lattices (h^2 + k^2 + l^2= 3, 4, 8, 11, 12, 16, 19, ...). Instead I am getting the sequence as 3, 13, 32.

The experiment was done simply by observing the XRD pattern from a single cubic crystal of NaCl, collected using Cu kalpha (wavelength = 154pm).

Also, how do I determine the hkl values from the angle of diffraction? ie: which planes will lead to constructive interference?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Powder will give you many orientations so all possible internal reflections will appear.
Depending on it's orientation, a single crystal will provide a greatly restricted number of peaks.

XRD a single crystal, then crush it to powder and repeat the XRD. Is there a difference?
 
Last edited:
Baluncore said:
Powder will give you many orientations so all possible internal reflections will appear.
Depending on it's orientation, a single crystal will provide a greatly restricted number of peaks.

XRF a single crystal, then crush it to powder and repeat the XRF. Is there a difference?
Many thanks for your reply. Unfortunately I am not allowed to powder the sample. Also, could I use standard techniques for powder sample calcuations to calculate the relative intensities of the peaks for this single crystal?
 
I would suggest that you experiment; obtain another salt crystal from the kitchen, then obtain data from that oriented crystal before crushing it to powder and repeating the process.

I do not know the make and model of your X-Ray diffractometer, or how it is arranged. If you rotate the single cubic crystal while it is axially aligned with the rotation, then the pattern will be of a 2D, not a 3D structure. Many spacing combinations may be missing.

To make a single crystal look like a powder you would need to tumble it on two axes. Depending on the instrument, that may be possible.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Back
Top