How to interpret a Summation and Cartesian product together in a formula

TheMarksman
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

\sum_{i=1}^n k_i \Pi_{i=1}^n O_i(\mu)

How to interpret this equation.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Actually the way it is written makes it ambiguous. The index should not be "i" in both. My best guess is that better notation would be
\sum_{i=1}^n k_i \Pi_{j=1}^n O_j(\mu)
in which case we could take the product outside the sum so it would be just
\left(\sum_{i=1}^n k_i\right)\left(\Pi_{j=1}^n O_j(\mu)\right)
and now, since the sum and product are separated, we could write that as
\left(\sum_{i=1}^n k_i\right)\left(\Pi_{i=1}^n O_i(\mu)\right)

Perhaps that is what is meant.
 
Thank you so much HallsofIvy.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top