How to Isolate Implicit Equations Involving Logs, Sines, and More?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tom92373
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Implicit Roots
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of isolating implicit equations involving functions like logs and sines, specifically the equation x^(3/2) = sin(x). The user seeks to find the exact value of x, noting that numerical approximations yield values around 0 and 8.02, but they doubt an analytical solution exists. They mention achieving a highly precise approximation of x to 500 decimal places using computational tools like Mathematica. The conversation also touches on the validity of x=0 as an exact solution, prompting further inquiry into the nature of implicit equations. Overall, the consensus leans towards the difficulty of finding exact solutions for such equations, with numerical methods being the most viable approach.
tom92373
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was working on double integrals when I came across the equation: x^(3/2)=sin(x).
There was no noticeable way to isolate the equation for x without having a function of x equal to x. I am wondering how to isolate equations involving logs, sines, etc when it is given in an implicit form.
Using a computer, I was able to get an approximation of 0 and 8.02... How do I get the EXACT value of x?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think that can be solved analytically, numerical approximations are the best you can get.
 
There's no reason to expect a nice solution to that equation.

To 500 decimal places:
0.80280373173788931551183532460400044122266891061652741081013964565691641862577997739822547061430396268572323604994666281323668533410644604205801464291930503518478667486487218236513935782397374909479614327907963131119225878971201268489647029085385407187785694454923172056331593018083775727247023723969536341968998158469732909155080566871504200160137298683450160853972584968512566509877215100019308073835565249990882682850748486897243599882872536008937760137965323934876164878700580114920356083682742718
 
How did you get an answer to 500 decimal places?!
 
Mathematica (for example) can do it.
 
What's wrong with x=0 as an exact solution??
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top