Schools How to know the teaching quality in physics grad programs

AI Thread Summary
When applying to physics graduate programs in Europe and North America, a strong emphasis is placed on teaching quality, including pedagogy, syllabus design, and passionate professors. The QS World Ranking by Subject provides a general overview of institutional quality but does not specifically address teaching culture. To gain insights into the teaching environment at various universities, prospective students are encouraged to connect with alumni of the programs and engage directly with program coordinators. However, access to such individuals may be limited, and admission competitiveness often dictates program choice, especially for those with standard qualifications.
hedgehog333
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am currently applying to physics graduate programs (considering both Master's and Ph.D.) in both Europe and North America. In choosing programs, I really care about teaching quality: emphasis on pedagogy, well-designed syllabi, and professors who are passionate about teaching. The QS World Ranking by Subject only gives a sense of overall quality of the school. I'm wondering what's the best way to learn about the teaching culture at a university/department. I'd appreciate any links to relevant discussions, forums, reviews, and rankings. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hedgehog333 said:
(considering both Master's and Ph.D.) in both Europe
What is your current level of education? In Europe, a Master degree is typically a requirement to enter a PhD program.
 
Orodruin said:
What is your current level of education? In Europe, a Master degree is typically a requirement to enter a PhD program.
I am about to finish my Bachelor's degree. You are right and that's why I'm applying to Masters in Europe and Canada, and PhD programs in the US :)
 
Ok, I just wanted to make sure you were clear on that issue as it was not obvious from your first post.

The best way of giving you an overview is to talk with people who have been through the programs, but unfortunately those may be difficult to come by. Other than that I would try to talk to the people responsible for the programs to hear their views on the matter. However, it is often going to be more of a matter of where you can gain admittance than having a choice about where to go unless you have an exceptionally outstanding CV.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
63
Views
8K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
162
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top