Schools How to know the teaching quality in physics grad programs

AI Thread Summary
When applying to physics graduate programs in Europe and North America, a strong emphasis is placed on teaching quality, including pedagogy, syllabus design, and passionate professors. The QS World Ranking by Subject provides a general overview of institutional quality but does not specifically address teaching culture. To gain insights into the teaching environment at various universities, prospective students are encouraged to connect with alumni of the programs and engage directly with program coordinators. However, access to such individuals may be limited, and admission competitiveness often dictates program choice, especially for those with standard qualifications.
hedgehog333
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am currently applying to physics graduate programs (considering both Master's and Ph.D.) in both Europe and North America. In choosing programs, I really care about teaching quality: emphasis on pedagogy, well-designed syllabi, and professors who are passionate about teaching. The QS World Ranking by Subject only gives a sense of overall quality of the school. I'm wondering what's the best way to learn about the teaching culture at a university/department. I'd appreciate any links to relevant discussions, forums, reviews, and rankings. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hedgehog333 said:
(considering both Master's and Ph.D.) in both Europe
What is your current level of education? In Europe, a Master degree is typically a requirement to enter a PhD program.
 
Orodruin said:
What is your current level of education? In Europe, a Master degree is typically a requirement to enter a PhD program.
I am about to finish my Bachelor's degree. You are right and that's why I'm applying to Masters in Europe and Canada, and PhD programs in the US :)
 
Ok, I just wanted to make sure you were clear on that issue as it was not obvious from your first post.

The best way of giving you an overview is to talk with people who have been through the programs, but unfortunately those may be difficult to come by. Other than that I would try to talk to the people responsible for the programs to hear their views on the matter. However, it is often going to be more of a matter of where you can gain admittance than having a choice about where to go unless you have an exceptionally outstanding CV.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
63
Views
8K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top