How to know when to stop and a problem is done

  • Thread starter Thread starter Newtons Apple
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Determining when to stop working on a math problem often hinges on understanding the specific requirements of the task. In the case of the equation x^2 + y^2 = 4, the goal is to express y as a function of x, which involves isolating y and recognizing when further simplification is unnecessary. The realization that the problem is complete comes when the equation is in the correct form, with y on one side and all other terms on the other. Many individuals experience confusion about whether additional steps are needed, leading to a cycle of re-evaluation. Ultimately, clarity about the problem's objective is key to knowing when to conclude the process.
Newtons Apple
Messages
73
Reaction score
1
Hey everyone, so I was working on problem that resulted in this:

y=√4-x^2 ( the 4-x^2 is under the square root)

and I was stumped as to what to do next... then later finally giving up, I realized that that was the end of the problem, and that it would just end in either negative or positive. This isn't the first time something like this has happened. How do you know when you're done working on a problem? Often times, I'd think I was done with a problem, and I had simplified is as low as possible, but then whamo! I was supposed to factor it, or do something else to it... How do you know if you've reached the end, or if there is more to do?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, you haven't said what the problem is! That's the crucial point. Every problem asks you to do some specific thing or answer a specific question. You are done when you have done what you were asked to do or answered the question.
 
lol, ok, well the problem was:
Determine whether the equation represents y as a function of x

x^2 + y^2 = 4

I moved the x^2 over to get y by itself etc.. and I square rooted y^2 to rip off the square. I was looking at the square root over the reamaing 4-x^2 and puzzled, not realizing that it was the end! Like I said, its not just this time, I always do that or never realizing if there's more steps involved, or if the equation or expression can be worked on more...
 
In that case you need to think about what it means for 'y to be a function of x.' In the simplest of terms, it is when you can write 'y' on one side of the equation, and all constants and 'x' terms on the other.

Do you have another example of when you found yourself in an endless loop? Or is it for similar types of problems?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top