I How to know whether it is +,- g and +,- y in the kinematic equations?

AI Thread Summary
Determining the sign of the vertical coordinate (y) and gravity (g) can be confusing, as it depends on the chosen coordinate system. Gravity is always directed towards the Earth, meaning if +y aligns with gravity, g is 9.8 m/s², and if it opposes, g is -9.8 m/s². Textbooks may vary in how they present these signs, so reviewing specific chapters and worked examples is essential for clarity. Understanding vector algebra and calculus can also help mitigate confusion regarding these concepts. Mastery of these fundamentals is crucial for solving physics problems effectively.
bluesteels
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
i was doing some problem and i have a hard time figuring out when will the y be positive and negative and same with the gravity idk if it -9.8 or 9.8
i was doing some problem and i have a hard time figuring out when will the y be positive and negative and same with the gravity idk if it -9.8 or 9.8
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If +y has same direction with gravity, it is 9.8.
If +y has opposite direction with gravity, it is -9.8.
 
bluesteels said:
Summary:: i was doing some problem and i have a hard time figuring out when will the y be positive and negative and same with the gravity idk if it -9.8 or 9.8

i was doing some problem and i have a hard time figuring out when will the y be positive and negative and same with the gravity idk if it -9.8 or 9.8
There's no way to figure it out. It's your choice! Gravity is always directed towards the Earth - there is no choice about that.

You can also use ##z##, rather than ##y##, for the vertical coordinate, if you want.
 
It's a great idea to study vector algebra (and some calculus) in parallel to learning mechanics. Compared to the confusion some intro textbooks avoiding this utmost important mathematical tool for all of physics, it's a little effort, and it helps to avoid the typical confusion about signs discussed in this thread!
 
anuttarasammyak said:
If +y has same direction with gravity, it is 9.8.
If +y has opposite direction with gravity, it is -9.8.
Most textbooks would already insert the minus sign in the latter case, so you would still replace g with 9.8.
 
bluesteels said:
Summary:: i was doing some problem and i have a hard time figuring out when will the y be positive and negative and same with the gravity idk if it -9.8 or 9.8

i was doing some problem and i have a hard time figuring out when will the y be positive and negative and same with the gravity idk if it -9.8 or 9.8
Every rextbook does it differently. You would need to look at the relevant chapters and read some of the worked examples.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'

Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'

(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Exact Integration of Newton's Gravitational Law?
Replies
25
Views
3K
I Kinematics cases with non-constant acceleration
Replies
4
Views
2K
B How to determine applied force when two objects collide? (basic physics engine)
Replies
9
Views
2K
I The Gyroscopic Effect: Precession, Nutation, & Boomerang Return
Replies
4
Views
2K
Question about Projectile Motion: Throwing a Flower Pot from a Balcony
Replies
18
Views
1K
Engineering Kinematic modelling of a mechanism (General Crank)
Replies
9
Views
2K
Kinematic Equations in Projectile Motion (this approach is not working)
Replies
16
Views
3K
I Origin of Centripetal force when the net force toward the center is 0?
Replies
8
Views
3K
Solving Kinematics Problem: V_o & Max Height
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Solve equation from dimensional analysis: 3 eq., 6 unknowns
Replies
1
Views
874

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top