How to Linearize a System of Differential Equations with Equilibrium Points?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linearize System
AI Thread Summary
To linearize the given system of differential equations, the Jacobian matrix must be evaluated at each equilibrium point. The equilibrium points identified are (0,0), (1000,1088), and (3129,0). For the point (0,0), the linearized system simplifies to a matrix indicating a saddle point, while for (1000,1088), the linearization leads to a different matrix suggesting stability characteristics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of neglecting non-linear terms when they become insignificant near the equilibrium points to accurately determine the eigenvalues and the nature of the equilibrium. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing the system's behavior around its equilibrium points.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
For this system of differential equations

\frac{dx}{dt} = x(0.8 -\frac{0.8x}{3129} - \frac{y}{x+1000})
\frac{dy}{dt} = y(-0.5 + \frac{x}{1000+x})
for all x,y \geq 0
now the equilibrium points are
(x,y) = (0,0), (1000,1088), (3129,0)

i need to linearize this system such taht i can figure out the eigenvalues of this system and figure out whether this system is a spiral sink, source or whatever

if i use x = u -1000 and y = v-1088
i get answers like this
\frac{dx}{dt} = (1.054u +2.55*10^{-4} u^2 -v) \frac{u+1000}{u+2000}
\frac{dy}{dt} = \frac{0.5uv - 544u}{2000 + u}
but hte denominator throws things off, doesn't it??
but if i just accept it like it is and assumethat as u,v approach zero the non linear terms get insignificant (ya you not proper math language)
and the matrix becomes
\left(\begin{array}{cc}0.527&-0.5\\0.272&0\end{array}\right)
is this right so far?? Any help would be appreciated, greatly!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
stunner5000pt said:
For this system of differential equations

\frac{dx}{dt} = x(0.8 -\frac{0.8x}{3129} - \frac{y}{x+1000})
\frac{dy}{dt} = y(-0.5 + \frac{x}{1000+x})
for all x,y \geq 0
now the equilibrium points are
(x,y) = (0,0), (1000,1088), (3129,0)

i need to linearize this system such taht i can figure out the eigenvalues of this system and figure out whether this system is a spiral sink, source or whatever

if i use x = u -1000 and y = v-1088
i get answers like this
\frac{dx}{dt} = (1.054u +2.55*10^{-4} u^2 -v) \frac{u+1000}{u+2000}
\frac{dy}{dt} = \frac{0.5uv - 544u}{2000 + u}
but hte denominator throws things off, doesn't it??
but if i just accept it like it is and assumethat as u,v approach zero the non linear terms get insignificant (ya you not proper math language)
and the matrix becomes
\left(\begin{array}{cc}0.527&-0.5\\0.272&0\end{array}\right)
is this right so far?? Any help would be appreciated, greatly!
The following briefly reviews key features of diff-eq Linearization technique. Steps 1 - 4 at bottom of review section provide guidance for OP to obtain problem solution.

Remember, linearization is the process of APPROXIMATING the original non-linear diff-eq system with a "Linearized System" about an Equilibrium Point (x0,y0). Thus, let the original non-linear system be given below (assuming no explicit function of "t" on the RHS):

<br /> \left (<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> (dx/dt) \\<br /> (dy/dt)<br /> \end{array} \right )<br /> = <br /> \left (<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> f(x,y) \\<br /> g(x,y)<br /> \end{array} \right )<br />

Then the Linearized System will utilize the Jacobian matrix (in red below) evaluated at an Equilibrium Point (x0,y0):

<br /> \left (<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> (dx/dt) \\<br /> (dy/dt)<br /> \end{array} \right )<br /> = <br /> \color{red} \left (<br /> \begin{array}{c c}<br /> f_{x}(x_{0},y_{0}) &amp; f_{y}(x_{0},y_{0}) \\<br /> g_{x}(x_{0},y_{0}) &amp; g_{y}(x_{0},y_{0})<br /> \end{array} \right ) \color{black} \cdot<br /> \left (<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> (x - x_{0}) \\<br /> (y - y_{0})<br /> \end{array} \right )<br />

By evaluating the Jacobian Eigenvalues, the Linearized System solutions and their characteristics (sink, spiral, etc.) can then be determined. Hence, the first objective is determining the Jacobian from appropriate Partials:

\frac{dx}{dt} = f(x,y) = x(0.8 -\frac{0.8x}{3129} - \frac{y}{x+1000})
\frac{dy}{dt} = g(x,y) = y(-0.5 + \frac{x}{1000+x})

Taking Partials of the above f(x,y) and g(x,y), we get:
fx(x,y) = (0.8) - (1.6)*x/(3129) - (y)*(1000)/{(x + 1000)^2}
fy(x,y) = (-x)/(x + 1000)
gx(x,y) = (y)*(1000)/{(x + 1000)^2}
gy(x,y) = (-0.5) + (x)/(x + 1000)

The steps are now the following:
1) Form Jacobian matrix with above Partials.
2) Evaluate Jacobian at an Equilibrium Point (x0,y0). ::: <---(by def: f(x0,y0) = g(x0,y0) = 0)
3) Determine Eigenvalues for the evaluated Jacobian.
4) Determine and interpret Linearized System Solutions from Eigenvalues.


~~
 
Last edited:


Yes, you are on the right track. To linearize this system, we can use the Taylor series expansion around the equilibrium point. In this case, we have three equilibrium points, so we need to linearize the system at each of these points separately.

For the first equilibrium point (0,0), we have x=u and y=v, so the linearized system becomes:

\frac{du}{dt} = 0.8u - \frac{0.8u^2}{3129} - \frac{v}{1000}
\frac{dv}{dt} = -0.5v + \frac{u}{1000}

To simplify this, we can assume that the non-linear terms (u^2 and uv) are small when u and v are close to zero, and thus can be neglected. This gives us the linearized system:

\frac{du}{dt} = 0.8u - \frac{v}{1000}
\frac{dv}{dt} = -0.5v + \frac{u}{1000}

We can now write this in matrix form as:

\left(\begin{array}{cc}0.8&-\frac{1}{1000}\\ \frac{1}{1000}&-0.5\end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{c}u\\v\end{array}\right)

This matrix has eigenvalues (0.85, -0.65), indicating that the equilibrium point (0,0) is a saddle point.

Similarly, for the second equilibrium point (1000,1088), we have x=u+1000 and y=v+1088, and the linearized system becomes:

\frac{du}{dt} = -u - \frac{0.8u^2}{3129} - \frac{v}{1000}
\frac{dv}{dt} = -0.5v + \frac{u}{1000}

Again, we can assume that the non-linear terms are small and neglect them, giving us the linearized system:

\frac{du}{dt} = -u - \frac{v}{1000}
\frac{dv}{dt} = -0.5v + \frac{u}{1000}

In matrix form, this becomes:

\left(\begin{array}{cc}-1&-\
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top