Schools How to proceed for grad school in physics after an awful undergrad performance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced by a recent physics graduate with poor exam performance and a fear of exams, now entering graduate school. Despite doubts about their abilities, the consensus is to remain positive about pursuing physics, emphasizing that potential extends beyond exam scores. The importance of overcoming exam phobia is highlighted, as graduate programs often require passing qualifying exams. The participant expresses concerns about their study habits, particularly the difficulty in reading textbooks thoroughly, which leads to incomplete coverage of material. Suggestions include focusing on one core text, such as Sakurai for Quantum Mechanics, and balancing depth of understanding with the breadth of course content. The conversation encourages a strategic approach to studying, advocating for prioritizing essential topics while recognizing the limitations of time and the complexity of the material.
su10
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i have just finished my undergrad in physics with dismal scores. i really wanted to study physics. i found it exciting and still do. but exams are a real hardle for me. i just have a phobia for them. now i am entering my grad school and for the first time after starting physics i am doubting my abilities. should i take my undergrad performance seriously to reassess myself or should i still be positive about pursuing physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Forgetting for now the past, how are you doing now in your current classes?
Most graduate programs have qualifying exams that you need to pass. So, you need to overcome your phobia of them.
 
well your school has accepted you for graduate entry. if they don't know, who does?
methinks there is a lot more to potential than what can be measured in a 2 - 3 hour exam. you passed, so that means.. you have passed the requirements to be awarded that degree - a great accomplishment!

i would say that you only live once and it is likely you would spend a long time asking "what-if" should you give up on your dream now.

and i would think there is a lot more to being a successful researcher than getting good grades. just follow your dream and keep working hard!
 
robphy said:
Forgetting for now the past, how are you doing now in your current classes?
Most graduate programs have qualifying exams that you need to pass. So, you need to overcome your phobia of them.

well, my grad school hasn't started yet. actually the exam system is a bit different here. we have one annual exam on all the courses. before that we just have lecture classes. there are no quizes, tutorials or assignments. so there is no way to assess yourself throughout the year.

beside exams one another obstacle that i found was in reading textbooks. i try to read each and every line of a text, trying to work out all the mathematical details. but after few weeks i see that i haven't gone far. this puts me off and i jump to another book trying to read it in the same manner. this has gone along all through my undergrad years. now i find myself not covering many important topics. what should be the correct approach in reading a text? what should be the approach in finishing a course even? say for example i am doing senior level Quantum Mechanics. should i target one core text (say sakurai) and try to go through it thoroughly within a year or should i stick to my course content? is it really possible to go through all the details of a text like sakurai? what i have found in this level is that there is too much topic to cover and too little time to grasp them all equally. so either you take a very proffessional approach and cover all the topics according to your course contents ignoring those aspects which you didn't have time to understand well or try to understand everything sacrificing your time.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top