How to prove $a_n\to 0$ using the sequence location theorem?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the sequence \(a_n\) converges to 0 given that \(\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} \to L\) with \(L < 1\) and \(a_n > 0\). The participants successfully established that the sequence is decreasing for sufficiently large \(n\) and provided two proofs for convergence to 0: an indirect proof using contradiction and a direct proof utilizing the sequence location theorem. The direct proof involves showing that \(a_n\) is bounded above by a geometric sequence that converges to 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits and convergence in sequences
  • Familiarity with the sequence location theorem
  • Knowledge of proof techniques, including proof by contradiction and induction
  • Basic properties of geometric sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the sequence location theorem in detail
  • Learn about proof techniques in mathematical analysis, particularly induction
  • Explore convergence criteria for sequences and series
  • Investigate geometric series and their convergence properties
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis or sequences and series, as well as educators seeking to deepen their understanding of convergence proofs.

alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Assume $\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}\to L$, where $L<1$ and $a_n>0$. Prove that

(a) $\{a_n\}$ is decreasing for $n\gg 1$;

I've done this part.

(b) $a_n\to 0$ (Give two proofs: an indirect one using (a), and a direct one.)

Indirect proof: Assume for the sake of argument that $a_n$ does not tend to 0. Since the sequence is decreasing and bounded below by 0, it must converge to a positive value (call it $l$).

$\lim\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}=\frac{l}{l}=1$, a contradiction. So, $a_n\to 0$.

How do I go about the direct proof (one that doesn't use "proof by contradiction")?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexmahone said:
How do I go about the direct proof (one that doesn't use "proof by contradiction")?

Hint

$|a_{n}-0|<\epsilon\Leftrightarrow |a_{n+1}\cdot (a_n/a_{n+1})|<\epsilon \Leftrightarrow |a_{n+1}|<|a_{n+1}/a_n|\epsilon$ and $a_{n+1}/a_n$ is bounded.
 
Fernando Revilla said:
Hint

$|a_{n}-0|<\epsilon\Leftrightarrow |a_{n+1}\cdot (a_n/a_{n+1})|<\epsilon \Leftrightarrow |a_{n+1}|<|a_{n+1}/a_n|\epsilon$ and $a_{n+1}/a_n$ is bounded.

Is this a proof by induction that $|a_n|<\epsilon$? If so, how do we prove the base case for $n=1$?
 
Last edited:
I would, rather, prove by induction that $0< a_n< L^n a_1$ and show that that geometric sequence converges to 0.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I would, rather, prove by induction that $0< a_n< L^n a_1$ and show that that geometric sequence converges to 0.

I used a slightly different approach:

$L<\frac{L+1}{2}$

$\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}<\frac{L+1}{2}$ for $n\gg 1$ (Using the "sequence location theorem")

So, $a_{n+1}< \left(\frac{L+1}{2}\right)a_n$ for $n\ge N$

$a_{N+k}<\left(\frac{L+1}{2}\right)^k a_N$ for $k\ge 1$ (Can be proved using induction over $k$.)

Since $\frac{L+1}{2}<1$, $a_{N+k}\to 0$ as $k\to\infty$.

So, $a_n\to 0$.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K