How to prove that the determinant of K is also zero without using eigenvalues?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EmmaSaunders1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Determinant
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the determinant of a matrix K is zero, given that a non-zero vector b multiplied by K results in the zero vector (bK = 0). Participants explore various methods to establish this without resorting to eigenvalues, focusing on theoretical and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if bK = 0 and b is non-zero, the determinant of K must be zero, using the uniqueness of solutions for the equation Kx = y when the determinant is non-zero.
  • Another participant questions how the non-uniqueness of the solution (KTb = 0) leads to the conclusion about the determinant, seeking clarification on the reasoning.
  • A later reply clarifies the use of the turnover rule for matrix multiplication and explains that the non-uniqueness implies the determinant must be zero.
  • Another approach is introduced using Kramer's rule, where the determinant of a modified matrix K is shown to be zero by replacing a row with zero and demonstrating the relationship with the original determinant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding and seek clarification on specific points, indicating that while some methods are proposed, there is no consensus on a single approach or resolution to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the conditions under which the determinant is evaluated, such as the non-zero nature of vector b and the implications of matrix operations on the determinant's value.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and practitioners in mathematics and linear algebra, particularly those exploring properties of determinants and matrix equations.

EmmaSaunders1
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi,

if vector b * matrix K = 0 (bK=o) what methods can one use to show that the determinant of K is therefore also zero, without using eigenvalues.

I have a feeling I am over complicating this.

Knd regards

Emma
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume b != 0. What else are you starting with? Are you allowed to use the fact that, for any square matrix K with determinant != 0, the equation Kx = y has a unique solution? If so, it is obvious that the solution to KTb = 0 is not unique, since KT0 = 0 also. Thus, the determinant of KT is 0, and since transposition doesn't change the determinant, the determinant of K must also be 0.
 
Sorry that's correct that b!=0

using for any square matrix K with determinant != 0, the equation Kx = y has a unique solution - is fine.

Im almost understand where your heading with this - would you please however clarify two steps;

you say KTb = 0 is not unique, since KT0 = 0 also. Thus, the determinant of KT is 0.

How do you know the value of the determinant from that statement alone,

Also is bK, the same as KTb, I noticed you switched the order of multiplication there.

Thanks for your help
 
Sorry, I should have written KTbT. I'm using the turnover rule for matrix multiplication: for any two matrices A and B, (AB)T = BTAT. In this case b is a row vector, a 1 x n matrix, and bT is a column vector, an n x 1 matrix. The only reason for doing it that way is that the uniqueness theorem is usually stated in terms of left multiplication and column vectors, but of course it also holds for right multiplication and row vectors.

you say KTb = 0 is not unique, since KT0 = 0 also. Thus, the determinant of KT is 0.

How do you know the value of the determinant from that statement alone
If the determinant of K (or KT) is not 0, the solution would be unique. Since the solution is not unique, the determinant must be 0.
 
Thats great - I really appreciate your help!
 
It can be proved directly using Kramer's rule. Write K=[k1;...;kn] (the kj are the rows) and let Kj be the matrix K with row j replaced with 0. Obviously det(Kj)=0 by row expansion.

Also 0=b*K=b1*k1+...+bn*kn, so det(Kj)=det([k1;...;b1*k1+...+bn*kn;...;kn])=det([k1;...;bj*kj;...;kn])=bj*det(K). Choose any j such that bj<>0 and this shows that det(K)=0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K