How to Prove the Classical Angular Momentum Commutation Relation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The classical angular momentum commutation relation is expressed as {Li, Lj} = εijkLk, where Li represents the components of angular momentum and εijk is the Levi-Civita symbol. To prove this relation classically, one must express Li in terms of generalized coordinates (qi) and momenta (pi) and apply the definition of the Poisson bracket. The discussion highlights the importance of clarity in notation, particularly avoiding confusion with square brackets in classical mechanics. Additionally, the extension of this relation to a general vector Vi is addressed, suggesting that the same commutation relation holds if Vi is appropriately constructed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics and angular momentum
  • Familiarity with Poisson brackets
  • Knowledge of the Levi-Civita symbol and its properties
  • Basic concepts of vector algebra in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Poisson brackets in classical mechanics
  • Explore the properties and applications of the Levi-Civita symbol
  • Investigate the construction of generalized vectors in classical mechanics
  • Learn about angular momentum in both classical and quantum contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in classical mechanics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of angular momentum and its applications in theoretical physics.

ssamsymn
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
[Li,Lj]=εijkLk

how can I prove this expression classically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Classically, L is not an operator, so you cannot define a commutator.

You can show that {Li, Lj}=εijkLk. I don't know if that's what you meant by saying "Classically". If so, just write out Li in terms of qi and pi. If you write the correct expression for it using Levi-Civita symbol and apply definition of Poisson bracket, it should be a trivial matter.
 
Yes, exactly. Thank you very much. Using square brackets may be confusing in classical mechanics. I figured out to make this with levi civita symbol. But there is another problem I have now. if I replace the Li with some general vector Vi, it should still be hold

{Vi,Lj}=εijkVk

how should I constract a general V vector?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K