How to separate induced voltage from terminal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cspeed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induced Voltage
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the induced voltage in a circuit with induction coils and a resistor. The user measures a terminal voltage of 0.14 V AC across a 40-ohm resistor with a current of 0.003 amps AC, leading to the assumption that the induced voltage in the coils is higher than the terminal voltage. The relationship between the changing magnetic flux and induced voltage is explained using the formula V(t) = -N d(Phi(t))/dt, emphasizing that the finite output impedance creates a voltage divider effect. The user seeks clarification on measuring open circuit source output voltage and understanding impedance (Z) for circuit analysis. The discussion concludes with the intention to analyze the magnetic flux changes during the AC cycle to determine the emf accurately.
Cspeed
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
I have a circuit set up like so: All in series, induction coils with internal resistance 22 ohms, attached to a resistor of 40 ohms.

When AC current is induced in the coils at a certain rate, the voltage dropped across the resistor is .14 V AC. The current, which should be the same throughout the entire circuit, is .003 amps AC.

I am trying to find out how much voltage is induced in the coils (as if there had been no internal resistance, nor a resistor). The .14 V seems to be the "terminal" voltage, so I'm guessing that more than .14 V are induced in the coils.

Am I thinking about this correctly? How would I find the induced V? If anything needs clarification, then please ask.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If the source of the changing flux through this secondary coil is loosely coupled (i.e., not a tightly-coupled transformer), then the load impedance on the secondary circuit will not affect how much flux is generated by the primary coil.

The changing flux in the secondary coil generates the secondary voltage via

V(t) = -N d(Phi(t))/dt

and that voltage across the total secondary impedance is what generates the secondary voltage. The finite output impedance of your secondary winding (its DCR) causes a voltage divider, and you see less than the total V(t) across your load resistor.

So yes, I think you are thinking about this correctly. You have the load resistance, coil resistance, and load voltage, so you can calculate the secondary coil source voltage from those, just as you do for any signal generator with a finite output impedance. BTW, What test is usually done to measure the open circuit source output voltage?
 
I haven't looked into impedance (Z) much at all, so I don't think I'll be able to understand until I do so. Is it necessary for me to understand Z so that I can analyze this circuit?

berkeman said:
BTW, What test is usually done to measure the open circuit source output voltage?

I'm not sure if I understand correctly, but do you mean the voltage output by the induction coils? That would equal the voltage across the resistor, or if you simply attach a voltmeter in series.

I would like to analyze this by looking at a single cycle of the AC. I want to find the change in magnetic flux is during the first half of each cycle (it might be increasing) and then what the change in flux is during the second half (descreasing, equal in magnitude). If I can find the emf, then I can find the delta flux, because I know the time. If I assumed that the emf were just the "terminal" voltage (.14 V), then I'd be ignoring a big part.

My values for AC are likely rms.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top