MHB How to show uniqueness in this statement for integers

cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

Directions: Decide whether the statement is a theorem. If it is a theorem, prove it. if not, give a counterexample.

There exists a unique integer n such that $$n^2+2=3$$.

Proof:
Let n be the integer.

$$n^2+2=3$$
$$n^2=1$$
$$n=\pm1$$

How show this is unique or not? Please explain why if not.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cbarker1 said:
Dear Everyone,

Directions: Decide whether the statement is a theorem. If it is a theorem, prove it. if not, give a counterexample.

There exists a unique integer n such that $$n^2+2=3$$.

Proof:
Let n be the integer.

$$n^2+2=3$$
$$n^2=1$$
$$n=\pm1$$

How show this is unique or not? Please explain why if not.

Hi Cbarker1,

You found 2 integer solutions that indeed satisfy the equation.
Doesn't that mean that the solution is not unique?
Our counter example is the fact that both n=-1 and n=+1 are solutions.
It would be different if we were only looking at natural numbers, excluding negative numbers, but 'just' integers can be negative.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Cbarker1,

You found 2 integer solutions that indeed satisfy the equation.
Doesn't that mean that the solution is not unique?
Our counter example is the fact that both n=-1 and n=+1 are solutions.
It would be different if we were only looking at natural numbers, excluding negative numbers, but 'just' integers can be negative.

Yes, since I found two solutions to satisfy the equation. therefore, n is not unique.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top