How to Simplify a Complicated Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter powp
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying the equation (\frac{ab^2c^{-3}}{2a^3b^{-4}})^{-2}. The correct simplification results in \frac{4a^4c^{6}}{b^{12}}. Key rules highlighted include flipping the fraction for negative exponents and applying the exponent to each part of a product. For those unsure of their calculations, using a calculator is suggested as a reliable alternative. The conversation emphasizes understanding the rules of exponents for accurate simplification.
powp
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
is this right??

Hello

I am simplifying this right?



(\frac{ab^2c^{-3}}{2a^3b^{-4}})^{-2}


\frac{4a^4c^{6}}{b^{12}}


Thanks
P
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes you have.
 
just remember the simple rules: if its a negative exponent flip the fraction, and if you have a product under the exponent each part is raised to the power separately.

ofcourse you can always just plug it into a calculator if you don't trust yourself at all...
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top