How to Solve a Gauss' Law Problem in a Spherical Region?

AI Thread Summary
To solve the Gauss' Law problem in a spherical region, the radial electric field can be derived from the voltage function v(r) = wr^p, resulting in E(r) = -Pwr^(p-1). Gauss' Law states that the electric flux through a closed surface equals the enclosed charge divided by the permittivity of free space (Q/ε0). To find the charge enclosed within a sphere of radius r, the relationship between the electric field and charge density must be established using the derived electric field. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the application of Gauss' Law to the voltage function, indicating a need for clarification on relating electric fields to charge distributions. Understanding these concepts is essential for completing the remaining parts of the problem.
dpd069
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a spherical region, the voltage is measured to be spherically symmetrical, with v=v(r)=wr^p
a. Find the radial electric field.
b. Use Gauss’ Law to find the charge enclosed in a sphere of radius r.
c. Find the charge enclosed by a sphere of radius r+dr.
d. Find the differential charge enclosed in the annular region between two concentric spheres of radii r and r+dr.
e. Find the differential volume of the annular region between two concentric spheres of radii r and r+dr.
f. Find the charge density, rho=rho(r)=?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i am pretty sure that part a would be v(r)= - integral E(r) dr. so the radial electric field would be -Pwr^(p-1)

i am confused on how to do the rest. any help/hints would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well what does gauss' law state?
 
Gauss' law states that the flux of the electric field is equal to Q/epsilon0.

my question then is how do i relate that to the given statement v(r)=wr^p?
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Electric field at a point inside a non-uniformly charged sphere
Replies
6
Views
1K
Gauss' law for a cavity in an insulator
Replies
2
Views
687
Use of imaginary charge vs Gauss' law
Replies
12
Views
899
Pressure versus stress in uniformly charged sphere
Replies
11
Views
1K
Gauss' Law applied to this Charged Spherical Shell with a small hole
Replies
10
Views
3K
Understanding the electric field of a sphere with a hole
Replies
12
Views
7K
Electric potential of nested spherical shells
Replies
4
Views
817
Using Gauss' Law to find the field at a point
Replies
6
Views
1K
Electric field external to Conducting Hollow Sphere with charge inside
Replies
23
Views
3K
No Electric Charges if No Electric Field in Region
Replies
22
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top