How to Solve Exponential and Polynomial Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ben-CS
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses two mathematical problems that lack elementary solutions. For the first problem, e^-x = x, it can be solved using the Lambert W function, leading to the solution x = ProductLog(1), with a numerical approximation of approximately 0.567143290409784. The second problem, x^y - y^x = xy - x - y, remains unsolved, with no clear method provided for finding y. The focus is on the limitations of elementary functions in solving these equations.
Ben-CS
Problem 1:

e^-x = x

Solve for x.


Problem 2:

x^y - y^x = xy - x - y

Solve for y.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Neither of these have "elementary" solutions (solutions in terms of the "elementary" functions: polynomial, rational, trig, log, exponential).

The first can be solved numerically or they can be solved in terms of the "Lambert W function".
 
Problem 1:

e^-x = x
e^x = 1/x
x e^x = 1
x = ProductLog(1), where ProductLog (a.k.a. Lambert's W-function) is defined as the inverse of f(W) = W e^W

Numerically, the answer is about 0.567143290409784

Problem 2:

I don't know. Sorry.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top